It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
high rated
Just posting this here in the hopes that the feature will get a few votes.

Basically copied from wishlist:

It would be nice if in your personal order history they marked game codes that were no longer functional. If for example a game code you received as part of a promotion and you failed to redeem, or have someone else redeem expired. That there would be a tag EXPIRED instead of NOT YET REDEEMED.

https://www.gog.com/wishlist/site/expired_game_codes_marked_in_order_history

I think this would be a nice convenience feature.

If you think this is a good idea please drop a vote. If it's not feel free to tell me why. If you are from the neutral planet I have just one thing to say to you: Hello.
Upvoted.

The last time I ran a giveaway, I included a couple of games with expired codes without even realizing it. One "winner" laughed it off and told me no worries, but I felt bad enough for the other one that I wound up buying the game for them again out of pocket.
I like that idea as well (voted of course). Expired keys should be marked in clear way.
https://www.gog.com/wishlist/site/expired_game_codes_marked_in_order_history

Voted for it
high rated
avatar
theslitherydeee: Just posting this here in the hopes that the feature will get a few votes.

Basically copied from wishlist:

It would be nice if in your personal order history they marked game codes that were no longer functional. If for example a game code you received as part of a promotion and you failed to redeem, or have someone else redeem expired. That there would be a tag EXPIRED instead of NOT YET REDEEMED.

https://www.gog.com/wishlist/site/expired_game_codes_marked_in_order_history

I think this would be a nice convenience feature.

If you think this is a good idea please drop a vote. If it's not feel free to tell me why. If you are from the neutral planet I have just one thing to say to you: Hello.
More importantly, the expiration date for each code should be visible from within one's orders. It makes zero sense for the owner of the unused code to have to go to the redeem page and plug in the code there (as if to redeem it) just to be able to see when or if it will expire. Obviously, your idea would be part of this; if the code has been invalidated -- whether manually, or because it passed its set expiration time -- the entry in the order history should be marked as "expired". Otherwise, it should give the expiration date in place of (or in addition to) the current "Not yet redeemed" message.
I agree, that would be helpful. Which means it won't happen any time soon...
Thank you for making this thread.

I did not know about this. I thought expired codes would just not appear.

I have to edit my post in the trading thread. I may have a lot less codes to trade with than I thought.
avatar
HunchBluntley: More importantly, the expiration date for each code should be visible from within one's orders. It makes zero sense for the owner of the unused code to have to go to the redeem page and plug in the code there (as if to redeem it) just to be able to see when or if it will expire. Obviously, your idea would be part of this; if the code has been invalidated -- whether manually, or because it passed its set expiration time -- the entry in the order history should be marked as "expired". Otherwise, it should give the expiration date in place of (or in addition to) the current "Not yet redeemed" message.
This. This would be especially helpful for gifting and in the case of the Community Giveaway to be able to confirm to zeogold an expiration date without him having to spend even more personal time checking all the codes.

Voted.
high rated
This would be a useful addition. It would be even better if it showed the expiration date directly, but just this would be great.
Voted. I also hope from hereon foreward there will be no secret expiration dates when it says 'expires: never' but it is just a fortnight and the code is dead.
high rated
avatar
HunchBluntley: More importantly, the expiration date for each code should be visible from within one's orders. It makes zero sense for the owner of the unused code to have to go to the redeem page and plug in the code there (as if to redeem it) just to be able to see when or if it will expire. Obviously, your idea would be part of this; if the code has been invalidated -- whether manually, or because it passed its set expiration time -- the entry in the order history should be marked as "expired". Otherwise, it should give the expiration date in place of (or in addition to) the current "Not yet redeemed" message.
^^So much this. Having to check the codes on the redeem page really makes absolutely no sense, plus is a very annoying and frustrating experience given that one's subjected to the atrocious Google Captcha.



avatar
Themken: Voted. I also hope from hereon foreward there will be no secret expiration dates when it says 'expires: never' but it is just a fortnight and the code is dead.
I've raised this issue with GOG Support, and they're still looking into it - given that it was during the 2017 summer sale this first popped up, GOG's been looking into it for over a year now, yet seems unable to find a way to fix it.
Post edited August 18, 2018 by HypersomniacLive
Bump
38 votes let's try and get a few more.
Post edited August 19, 2018 by theslitherydeee
Made my point with Support recently about this very matter. Hopefully this picks up traction so they will implement it as it is a no-brainer. I almost insisted they activate the code since it had no expiration marked in ANY of the documentation available to me (Email, order info, or e-receipt) so it can't technically be expired if I wasn't properly told about it. I decided against it because I do like GOG and don't want any guff between us.
Good idea, voted.
Already voted. Actually I think about this every single time I see an unredeemed key listed on my orders page, it's a hassle to not have this information in that same section and it just feels like a very unnecessary one because to implement this should be trivial.