hedwards: I know, it's not really good enough, but if they make the change I'll go back to donating. Really, it only takes about 2 weeks in order to show up in the blood sample, so 6 months would be more than enough time to allow for it to show up.
Garran: 6 months or 12 months (that point seems to vary by country) is standard for all sex-related deferrals (not just those related to gay sex) because there are a range of diseases that can be transmitted that way, and two weeks is by no means enough to be certain about most of them.
In the US, we use the rules as a way of judging people. There's a few things like this that lead to lifetime bans on donation, but there's other things that net a 2 year ban. I think exchanging drugs for sex is one of those, but I haven't donated blood in ages.
Boycotting is asinine, but I just don't feel comfortable or wanted. Which is a shame because I've got O+ blood that's always in demand, I just don't need to go somewhere that I'm going to be judged.
hedwards: But, what they really need to do is start providing actual sex ed to gay men. The classes in elementary, middle and high school are completely worthless if you're having sex with other men.
Garran: From what I've heard, those classes as presented in the US are usually useless to everyone. :P
That depends where you are. In much of the US, you're absolutely correct. That abstinence only BS is great for those that abstain, but the moment these people have sex, they now know absolutely nothing about how to protect against STIs and pregnancy. They certainly don't know the degrees of safety that can be gained through various choices.
Around here when I was in school, the main criticisms I have are the horrible pictures of diseased genitals that they use to scare people away from sex and the fact that it focuses way too much on heterosexual sex without anything for gay or lesbian sex.