If those numbers translate into the market as a whole, i'll have to settle with being part of that top 5%, the elite among the elite.
Ahh those were the days, chasing server firsts, flying with mimiron's head high above stormwind.

It's funny how they were able to break even before the game was even released. :P

A quick look at what titles were released around the same time here on GOG should tell you everything you need to know.

Keep in mind that the game gives a Steam key, both when sold directly from the developer's website and through Humble Store, so the number could be even lower.

Yes and no :o)

A quick look at the "new" panel on the homepage shows it was stuck between Bethesda relases from one side and Fran Bow/Satellite Reign on the other side. I understand your point of view but it reminds me of indies afraid to release when GTA5 was out on PC => if the game genres are totally far away from each other, they wouldn't cannibalize their sales in a significant manner (not going from "potential success" to failure"). And in this case, a "management" game is really far away from RPG, FPS and P'n'C....

Anyway, now that you brought that up, I would be curious to see how the game was promoted on GOG at that time: was in the first upper slot of the homepage or was it just a small "news" buried under the Bethesda banner?

Behold the power of the Internet Archive.

Nice! I thought the Internet Archive was only to dig up websites from the Geocities era ;o)

Early access combined with previous marketing and an actually good game. Compare it with a release on Steam. The visibility of an Indie title is / can be a lot smaller. A dev might even see his just released title drop off the frontpage within hours - so, no.

It's unclear to me that it was 5% of total sales. He says "5% of total sales over the launch period". What the "launch period" is is ambiguous. Hard to tell whether or not it includes the massive sales figures from the beta period (prior to Steam/GOG/Humble launch).

Lucky fella, though. He's done really well!

For me, it's clear he means the total sales on the period of the launch of the "1.0 version"

It's at the bottom of the 21 page of the best seller list... So yeah...

Goggers prefers their RPGs I think. :)

One thing a little more disheartening (to me) is that Technobabylon is just a few games away, while being a damn good game from an old school style that do traditionnaly fairly well here...

From the marketing, I noticed nothing. Seems like he concentrated on multipliers. It would be really interesting to know how h bills his development and marketing time.

I haven't bought it yet, but will later (on GOG). The backlog is big and even 'must plays' like Pacific General are sitting idle on the computer. That game got released more than three months earlier if I remember correct, and it is next to Big Pharma in the bestsellers list...

It's interesting as Technobabylon is somehow in the cyberpunk graphic style which is somehow appealing to pc gamers. Dave Gilbert wrote a little about this in terms of marketing:
http://www.wadjeteyegames.com/2015/01/22/female-characters-marketing-consistancy-design/

PS: while I was searching back for this link, I also found out a Technobabylon post-mortem:
http://www.gamasutra.com/view/news/248567/Postmortem_Technocrats_cyberpunk_adventure_game_Technobabylon.php

The game was published by Positech so it already had the userbase leverage as the game was likely to appeal to "Democracy" buyers for example (I "discovered" the game because the owner of Positech tweeted a lot about it for months)

Can you tell me where that point is on his ROI graph? Does it coincide with the Steam Launch?