I'm disappointed in GOG's developing approach to the Preservation Program. I subscribed as soon as it was announced, and while there were a few occasions to vote on games to go into the preservation program, I worry the company is leading harder into using FOMO as a marketing tactic. If you're a big CRPG fan and don't like RTS games, this is a precedent-setting vote that will influence the future of the preservation program.
I would have preferred that our money go toward an all-hands-on-deck approach preserving the most acclaimed and noteworthy games in history, or otherwise games difficult to run on modern consoles, rather than specific genres. It's weird to say that as a patron, I wouldn't want to be involved in direct decision-making, but that is how I feel. Who am I to decide what the most import games to preserve are, just because I'm in a league of the the highest bidders?
I unsubscribed for the time being due to GOG's recent newsletter controversy and what was in my opinion a lack of an adequate response. Anyway, with the timing of these two events, it's hard not to feel like this post was a way to recoup for all the people who unsubscribed, rather than a decision made in the best interest of games preservation.
This is still my storefront of choice, I really appreciate the work GOG does, and I may re-subscribe in the future, but I'm starting to worry that GOG is beginning to go downhill after the acquisition, though I hope that's not the case and I'm happy to give the benefit of the doubt as things develop.
Post edited June 10, 2026 by HexGramarye