It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
Starting today, GOG Patrons can cast votes to determine which genre should be favored in the GOG Preservation Program – join them, and decide what we save next!

If you're a GOG Patron, your votes will help us shape our priorities, evaluate the urgency of our Preservation Program across a diverse range of genres, and possibly create future lists of titles to vote on during the next Patrons Voting.

This time around, you get to choose between classic CRPGs, immersive sims, real-time strategy, classic adventure games, or old-school shooters.

Cast your stars and help preserve gaming history!
high rated
avatar
nospamplease: can Patrons request a public statement that GOG does not support neo-nazi causes? That would be great.
Ok, I really feel like I'm out of the loop now. What did I miss?
high rated
2 FPS, 1 RTS.
high rated
"Become a Patron and determine which genre should be favored in the GOG Preservation Program!"

I'll become a patron the day I can determine which OS should be favored in the GOG Preservation Program.

Until then, it is not really preservation.

But cool that you are keeping games running in Windows. Microsoft is grateful for your contribution to their ecosystem.
Post edited June 10, 2026 by Magnitus
high rated
Cast your runes and help GOG make another shooter playable for the masses.
high rated
avatar
lupineshadow: Cast your runes and help GOG make another shooter playable for the masses.
I think there's been enough trouble involving runes for now...
Post edited June 10, 2026 by DarkSaber2k
high rated
avatar
Ghildrean: GOG, here is a suggestion from a dirty peasant that won't ever pay for your subscription service: focus on the era of gaming that has the most compatibility issues, late 90s early 2000s.
Which just so happens to be the more or less exact time frame that all five of the genres to vote on arguably were at their peak.
high rated
avatar
Ghildrean: GOG, here is a suggestion from a dirty peasant that won't ever pay for your subscription service: focus on the era of gaming that has the most compatibility issues, late 90s early 2000s.
avatar
ortewor: Which just so happens to be the more or less exact time frame that all five of the genres to vote on arguably were at their peak.
I was going to say - doesn't "classic CRPGs, immersive sims, real-time strategy, classic adventure games, and old-school shooters" cover games originally released in the late 90s & early 2000s, almost exclusively?
high rated
I joined Patron to support GOG. I would recommended a new system for the Patron program not just with votes
high rated
34 people in the last 3 days saw the recent publicity for GOG and decided - hey this is a good time to join the patron program.

Most of them don't have far-right profile pictures, so that's something I suppose.
high rated
avatar
00063: Wow you idiots are getting scammed even more than i thought... ROFLOL
We're well aware. Makes it easier to nag the staff though.
high rated
avatar
SargonAelther: Patrons should be able to suggest games for the Preservation Program. And I'm not talking about mindlessly asking for a pointless sticker to be slapped on a favourite game. There are games that are actually broken on GOG (and / or Steam too), but are easily fixable. Patrons should be allowed to submit such games, along with fix instructions. It would be beneficial for everyone and it would give you an advantage over Steam.
Even though I don't support this patron thing this is what GOG should actually do.....
high rated
avatar
SargonAelther: Patrons should be able to suggest games for the Preservation Program. And I'm not talking about mindlessly asking for a pointless sticker to be slapped on a favourite game. There are games that are actually broken on GOG (and / or Steam too), but are easily fixable. Patrons should be allowed to submit such games, along with fix instructions. It would be beneficial for everyone and it would give you an advantage over Steam.
avatar
alexandros050: Even though I don't support this patron thing this is what GOG should actually do.....
Yeah, if they opened up the submission to everybody, that would be even better. I'm certainly not gonna gate keep.
high rated
I'm disappointed in GOG's developing approach to the Preservation Program. I subscribed as soon as it was announced, and while there were a few occasions to vote on games to go into the preservation program, I worry the company is leading harder into using FOMO as a marketing tactic. If you're a big CRPG fan and don't like RTS games, this is a precedent-setting vote that will influence the future of the preservation program.

I would have preferred that our money go toward an all-hands-on-deck approach preserving the most acclaimed and noteworthy games in history, or otherwise games difficult to run on modern consoles, rather than specific genres. It's weird to say that as a patron, I wouldn't want to be involved in direct decision-making, but that is how I feel. Who am I to decide what the most import games to preserve are, just because I'm in a league of the the highest bidders?

I unsubscribed for the time being due to GOG's recent newsletter controversy and what was in my opinion a lack of an adequate response. Anyway, with the timing of these two events, it's hard not to feel like this post was a way to recoup for all the people who unsubscribed, rather than a decision made in the best interest of games preservation.

This is still my storefront of choice, I really appreciate the work GOG does, and I may re-subscribe in the future, but I'm starting to worry that GOG is beginning to go downhill after the acquisition, though I hope that's not the case and I'm happy to give the benefit of the doubt as things develop.
Post edited June 10, 2026 by HexGramarye
high rated
avatar
HexGramarye: This is still my storefront of choice, I really appreciate the work GOG does, and I may re-subscribe in the future, but I'm starting to worry that GOG is beginning to go downhill after the acquisition, though I hope that's not the case.
In my opinion after the acquisition things have been going very well with the exception of this patron thing. GOG has managed to secure many titles which would have never come here in the first place because CDPR didn't care about GOG at all. They only cared about using GOG as a store to get 100% of the profits for CDPR games.
high rated
avatar
HexGramarye: This is still my storefront of choice, I really appreciate the work GOG does, and I may re-subscribe in the future, but I'm starting to worry that GOG is beginning to go downhill after the acquisition, though I hope that's not the case.
avatar
alexandros050: In my opinion after the acquisition things have been going very well with the exception of this patron thing. GOG has managed to secure many titles which would have never come here in the first place because CDPR didn't care about GOG at all. They only cared about using GOG as a store to get 100% of the profits for CDPR games.
All those things are good, I agree.