Posted March 09, 2019
lazydog: Early adoption has it's own perils, as can be seen by this post.
The fact is, Pale moon worked fine before, now it doesn't. I would also agree with an earlier post- no other site I use has any problems with Palemoon.
If Gog want to take chances on their own store page not functioning because they have chosen "early" adoption ahead of users, I believe this is a bad decision.
I also do not understand why you continue to defend Gog/state that the only answer to this problem is switch browser.
Being a web dev myself I'm totally with the users on this one. I find it unprofessional to require users to use the "latest" Chrome or Firefox, especially as a store front. And IMO it's actually really laziness or lack of skill to break a page for older browsers. Nothing of the new features is really essential, most things can be worked around really easily, and people using IE or Firefox ESR are often forced to (at work), people with SeaMonkey or Palemoon choose to do so. The fact is, Pale moon worked fine before, now it doesn't. I would also agree with an earlier post- no other site I use has any problems with Palemoon.
If Gog want to take chances on their own store page not functioning because they have chosen "early" adoption ahead of users, I believe this is a bad decision.
I also do not understand why you continue to defend Gog/state that the only answer to this problem is switch browser.
Now, I can understand if in those browsers some things don't look as nice, some things are off, whatever... Rendering engines are a bitch, and something is always broken in some browser. Tell me about it, I'm doing this since 1995 (as a hobby) and since 2001 professionally.
The thing is, the page has to work, especially if you want to sell things.
Let me rephrase that:
THE FUUCKING PAGE HAS TO FUUCKING WORK