It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
All games in one place? Steam? GOG?

Tell you what, I'll do you one better:

All my games on my PC.
avatar
blotunga: Memory sticks are actually the worst thing to store data on the long term. Buy a NAS and store it there.
But can I shove a NAS up my butt? No. Memory stick wins!
avatar
pkk234: Would you guys want some kind of way to display the games as a collection?
I realize GoG has the 'bookshelf' thing, but it just looks like a grid, not a collection.

Maybe being able to manual drag and drop games in whatever order you want might help.
This is the part where I plug Adalia Fundamentals.
avatar
blotunga: Memory sticks are actually the worst thing to store data on the long term. Buy a NAS and store it there.
I tried to get information about that earlier, and at least to me the articles suggested that flash memories (like USB memory sticks):

- Are very good for long term archiving of data.

- Are bad for constant rewrites, ie. they will eventually become unusable if you keep writing stuff to them. That is why I stopped my experiment to run a Linux distro installation from a bit USB memory stick, as e.g. the swap file partition will be constantly rewritten, and other stuff too (temp files, browser caches and such, I guess). Otherwise that setup ran great though, except that it was a bit slow running as the USB memory stick (with the Linux installation) was on a USB 2.0 port.

So all in all, flash memory is very good for "save and forget" archiving, the data will stay there for a long time. But if you intend to update that archive constantly, then no.

That said, I don't use USB memories for long-term archival purposes because of their high cost per gigabyte, compared to e.g. HDDs.
Post edited December 21, 2017 by timppu
avatar
pkk234: Would you guys want some kind of way to display the games as a collection?
I realize GoG has the 'bookshelf' thing, but it just looks like a grid, not a collection.

Maybe being able to manual drag and drop games in whatever order you want might help.
We literally used to have this here. Portrait orientation box art that could be arranged.
avatar
blotunga: Memory sticks are actually the worst thing to store data on the long term. Buy a NAS and store it there.
avatar
timppu: I tried to get information about that earlier, and at least to me the articles suggested that flash memories (like USB memory sticks):

- Are very good for long term archiving of data.

- Are bad for constant rewrites, ie. they will eventually become unusable if you keep writing stuff to them. That is why I stopped my experiment to run a Linux distro installation from a bit USB memory stick, as e.g. the swap file partition will be constantly rewritten, and other stuff too (temp files, browser caches and such, I guess). Otherwise that setup ran great though, except that it was a bit slow running as the USB memory stick (with the Linux installation) was on a USB 2.0 port.

So all in all, flash memory is very good for "save and forget" archiving, the data will stay there for a long time. But if you intend to update that archive constantly, then no.

That said, I don't use USB memories for long-term archival purposes because of their high cost per gigabyte, compared to e.g. HDDs.
They informed you wrong. Flash memory is based on an electric charge which in time degrades. Flash memory is the worst long term storage possible.
I used to be bugged about this but since I've started using Launchbox it's pretty much a non-issue for me (there are other front-ends you can use, but that's my personal choice). I just open the program, see my whole collection and it doesn't really matter what site I used to get which game because they're all right there in a grid and I can double-click on any of them and load them up as long as they're installed.
avatar
blotunga: They informed you wrong. Flash memory is based on an electric charge which in time degrades. Flash memory is the worst long term storage possible.
Interesting, since e.g. these articles tell a different story:

https://www.techwalla.com/articles/life-expectancy-of-a-usb-flash-drive

Nonvolatile memory does not require a power source to function and to hold stored data. Thus, a USB flash drive keeps data indefinitely, at least for 10 years, without any loss of information.
http://www.flashbay.com/blog/usb-life-expectancy

The article also talks about "ten years", but in the comments section the site owner(?) even goes to say:

We reckon at least 60 to 80 years if left in a safe in the perfect environment. Over these time periods I think oxidation would be the rate determining step to failure. But from real world test, as this technology is new, 10 years is certainly attainable.
Anyway, I don't use them for long time archiving mainly due to the cost, so whether that is true or not doesn't matter much to me. A one terabyte USB memory stick costs around 1000€ here, no thanks.
avatar
blotunga: They informed you wrong. Flash memory is based on an electric charge which in time degrades. Flash memory is the worst long term storage possible.
... and magnetic storage hard drives rely on spindle motors, which wear out in time... and CDs and DVDs (the writable/re-writable kind) rely on an organic data retention layer which degrades over time... and tape will demagnetize over time as well. Pick your poison :).

Always remember keep your data in at least two places at the same time and you should be reasonably safe regardless of what it is stored on.

P.S.: But you're right I guess. If I were a betting man (which I am, with my own data), I'd keep things for long term storage on lightly-used external hard drives nicely tucked somewhere at room temperature and away from any strong magnetic interference.
avatar
plagren: But can I shove a NAS up my butt? No. Memory stick wins!
Better build yourself a DNA-based storage device - it's less painful. That double helix has more space than you'll ever need!
Post edited December 21, 2017 by WinterSnowfall
avatar
Breja: I wouldn't find that fulfilling at all. It would feel like playing pretend. Those wouldn't be the real thing. They would not feel like a real collection, there would be no nostalgic value about them down the line. I could just as well make a wallpaper with a photo of shelves with games on it :P
avatar
koima57: The closest i got my old shelf is this...

https://darkadia.com/member/kwama57
Total games, 4187!?!?!? :S

With the pile of shame being only 205 games, how did you get the time to finish the rest? :S
Post edited December 22, 2017 by IwubCheeze
avatar
koima57: The closest i got my old shelf is this...

https://darkadia.com/member/kwama57
avatar
IwubCheeze: Total games, 4187!?!?!? :S

With the pile of shame being only 205 games, how did you get the time to finish the rest? :S
Ahhh i did not finish 90% of that mountain, just ticked "completed" for most. Collectionite syndrome... It is hundreds of Groupees + Humble and other PC bundles + Android few that get this crazy number; if i ever sort my list out with only what i like i may account to 300-500 "only", with consoles getting the lion share, i like to buy physical for those.
Post edited December 22, 2017 by koima57