Vitek: Yeah, they were probably still outselling the Enhanced Edition and everyone could see them on top of bestselling games. So that's why Beamdog most likely decided to not allow people to purchase them instead of their version.
Hickory: Quite. And now, new players coming to the franchise will never see or know that the classic versions exist: you cannot find them on GOG at all, except buried in the 'included with...' blurb. From top sellers to total obscurity. This is disgraceful.
Agree, and agree. A revolting development all around. The Originals have every right to be viewed on their own (very strong) merits, completely apart from the Enhanced versions.
You know what's funny? A friend of mine got BG1 EE on his tablet a while ago; I remembered trying it then, and *not* being thoroughly disgusted with it. Then, more recently, I tried the PC port of BG1 EE, and just... yuck!
Then, not long ago, said friend came over for a visit, and I got to side-by-side compare the two versions; the *tablet* version is FAR superior! Practically every complaint I had about the PC version (and I had a lot) was gone from the tablet version. It even LOOKS better graphically, AND it retails for HALF the price ($10!!), AND the new NPCs are completely optional (they're paid DLC, but I don't care for them anyway, so heck with 'em).
I'm curious: which BG1 EE came first, tablet or PC? And the PC version really does feel like a sloppy, lazy port, in comparison; why such a disparity in quality? Doesn't speak well for Beamdog.
To anyone reading this: if you're at all curious/interested specifically in the Enhanced Edition of Baldur's Gate 1 or 2 or Icewind Dale, and you have a tablet of some kind, GET THE TABLET VERSION! Better for cheaper? Yes, please!