It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like:Chrome,Firefox,Internet Explorer orOpera

×
arrow-down2arrowcart2close4fat-arrow-leftfat-arrow-rightfeedbackfriends2happy-facelogo-gognotificationnotifications-emptyownedremove-menusad-facesearch2wishlist-menuwishlisted2own_thingsheartstartick
avatar
Stig79: BG3 would probably have a new protagonist. They kind of closed the story off with that Murder in Baldur's Gate module.

Still a BG3 will use 5ed. Which means 200 years after BG2, otherwise it would be dumb as hell as far as plot-holes go.
avatar
Hickory: And this is precisely why there should not be a "Baldur's Gate 3". The story is closed. Finished. Put to bed. Why the hell can't they do what everybody and their dog has been telling them to do: create something new of their own instead of leeching and cash-grabbing from popular products? [Rhetorical]
According to the infamous Amber Scott interview "We wanted to make our own game but it was too much work"

That is one helluva dev. Making their own games = too much work....