It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
high rated
avatar
hedwards: Right, having a KS campaign defrauding people is clearly not a good reason for us to be pissed about being
avatar
orcishgamer: Yeah, said "cheating" has been blown way the fuck out of proportion, so yeah, it's WHARGARBLE.
Honestly, I generally like you, but you're being an idiot if you can't see that we were cheated. They apparently fraudulently claimed that they were working on a DRM free game, and now it turns out that it's a limited release for the 36k KS backers. And that we're being forced to choose between the DLC and the DRM free version.

And no, the "cheating" as you put it, is not being blown out of proportion, I would never have given them any money to develop what is effectively a Steam only release. Had they said that up front, I would never have given them any money.

So, yes, they were fucking cheating people of their hard earned money. Yes, I do get a game, but I don't get the game that I paid for, I get either a Steam game, which I don't want, or a DRM Free version that's unlikely to see the kind of expansion that the Steam version will get.

It's pretty much inevitable given that the total user base of the DRM free version is less than 36k.
avatar
hedwards: Yes, it's a bit of hyperbole, but the bottom line is that the DRM free version is unlikely to see the level of modding that the Steam version will as it's only available to the KS backers.

A game of this sort can have a ton of content that comes from 3rd party developers, and it's really disgusting that the KS backers are going to be stuck loading up a Steam copy to get to play them, especially seeing as it's supposed to be a DRM free game that we were given.

All, I want is what they promised, nothing more. There was no mention made that they would be crippling the KS backer version to appease MS. They could have disclosed it and probably made enough to fund their goal, they just wouldn't have had my money.
avatar
orcishgamer: They already stated that sideloading content will work just fine. So anything made for the Steam version will sideload, even using a mod manager to do it. All that community content that was promised will be yours if you want it.

So, all you don't get is some nebulous, unpromised (and untalked about during the KS) DLC. Given that, are you still that angry?
Which will work just fine so long as the mods don't use assets from later DLC, and the mod authors bother to make it available outside of Steam.

The point here is that they fraudulently claimed to be working on a DRM free game, and now we find out that it's Steam only for anybody that didn't buy a copy during the KS campaign. I don't fund Steam only software.

What's more, I'm being put in a position where their fraud has caused me to buy into something where I'm being forced to either use Steam or do without potentially great content.

I don't think that bitching about fraud is unreasonable. They sure as hell wouldn't have gotten any of my money had they been honest about it.
avatar
orcishgamer: No, what they said in the latest update was:

"Backers who want a DRM-free experience with Shadowrun Returns (on Windows, OSX, and Linux) are getting the game, editor and all, and will be able to transfer community-created story files and update executables manually. (It works just like a non-Steam version of Skyrim: you can install mods manually or via a 3rd-party tool such as Nexus.) The DRM-free version will not require any internet connection or any form of online authorization to play.* In addition, Backers who like the convenience and reliability of Steam and who want automatic updates, easy-to-browse content, and a DLC store are getting them."

Is there any other source for the information you're indicating? According to their latest update only their post Berlin DLC will not sideload, ALL user generated content will.
avatar
Neobr10: Don't waste your time discussing about it. The DRM-free version is exactly the same as Steam's version except for future DLC that was NOT mentioned in the KS campaign. Backers are getting EXACTLY what they pledged for. But people need a reason to be pissed and moan, even when there's none. I think the only way to make them happy would be to completely eliminate Steam's version and release only the DRM-free version.

Remember when Brian Fargo said that Wasteland 2 would be released on Origin too and people got pissed and said that he "sold out" to EA? People just love to moan.
Except it's not exactly what we were told about. We were never told that we were funding the development of a Steam only game. And that's really important to me, I don't like Steam exclusives and I sure as hell ain't interested in funding them with my preorder money.

I don't care if they have a Steam release or not, but making it the only source of the software after the KS campaign ended is something they shouldn't have done. And they sure as hell shouldn't be limiting us to the Steam version if and when they release new DLC.
avatar
hedwards: Right, having a KS campaign defrauding people is clearly not a good reason for us to be pissed about being cheated.

When they signed EA, IIRC, MS was one of the publishers that they listed as being possibly close.
avatar
jackalKnight: At no point did they flat out say MS was imminent. I supplied a longstanding MS policy in regards to XBox. You supplied something you desperately want to happen but had no concrete evidence of.
You said they never hinted that MS might be joining them, and now you're claiming that they never said that MS was imminent. Make up your mind, I already proved that they had hinted at it, now you're changing the standards.
Post edited April 13, 2013 by hedwards
Well, they are honoring their word to provide a drm-free version so they haven't broken their promise. I don't buy their reasons for not including future dlc in the drm-free version, but it is their choice.

Now if they put in artificial measures to specifically prevent people from putting in fancontent or dlc instead of just not supporting it, dick move. But they kept their word.
low rated
avatar
orcishgamer: Yeah, said "cheating" has been blown way the fuck out of proportion, so yeah, it's WHARGARBLE.
avatar
hedwards: Honestly, I generally like you, but you're being an idiot if you can't see that we were cheated. They apparently fraudulently claimed that they were working on a DRM free game, and now it turns out that it's a limited release for the 36k KS backers. And that we're being forced to choose between the DLC and the DRM free version.

And no, the "cheating" as you put it, is not being blown out of proportion, I would never have given them any money to develop what is effectively a Steam only release. Had they said that up front, I would never have given them any money.

So, yes, they were fucking cheating people of their hard earned money. Yes, I do get a game, but I don't get the game that I paid for, I get either a Steam game, which I don't want, or a DRM Free version that's unlikely to see the kind of expansion that the Steam version will get.

It's pretty much inevitable given that the total user base of the DRM free version is less than 36k.
avatar
orcishgamer: They already stated that sideloading content will work just fine. So anything made for the Steam version will sideload, even using a mod manager to do it. All that community content that was promised will be yours if you want it.

So, all you don't get is some nebulous, unpromised (and untalked about during the KS) DLC. Given that, are you still that angry?
avatar
hedwards: Which will work just fine so long as the mods don't use assets from later DLC, and the mod authors bother to make it available outside of Steam.

The point here is that they fraudulently claimed to be working on a DRM free game, and now we find out that it's Steam only for anybody that didn't buy a copy during the KS campaign. I don't fund Steam only software.

What's more, I'm being put in a position where their fraud has caused me to buy into something where I'm being forced to either use Steam or do without potentially great content.

I don't think that bitching about fraud is unreasonable. They sure as hell wouldn't have gotten any of my money had they been honest about it.
avatar
Neobr10: Don't waste your time discussing about it. The DRM-free version is exactly the same as Steam's version except for future DLC that was NOT mentioned in the KS campaign. Backers are getting EXACTLY what they pledged for. But people need a reason to be pissed and moan, even when there's none. I think the only way to make them happy would be to completely eliminate Steam's version and release only the DRM-free version.

Remember when Brian Fargo said that Wasteland 2 would be released on Origin too and people got pissed and said that he "sold out" to EA? People just love to moan.
avatar
hedwards: Except it's not exactly what we were told about. We were never told that we were funding the development of a Steam only game. And that's really important to me, I don't like Steam exclusives and I sure as hell ain't interested in funding them with my preorder money.

I don't care if they have a Steam release or not, but making it the only source of the software after the KS campaign ended is something they shouldn't have done. And they sure as hell shouldn't be limiting us to the Steam version if and when they release new DLC.
avatar
jackalKnight: At no point did they flat out say MS was imminent. I supplied a longstanding MS policy in regards to XBox. You supplied something you desperately want to happen but had no concrete evidence of.
avatar
hedwards: You said they never hinted that MS might be joining them, and now you're claiming that they never said that MS was imminent. Make up your mind, I already proved that they had hinted at it, now you're changing the standards.
You had no actual evidence, just "hints". "Hints" don't prove a damn thing.
Did they ever post even the vaguest allusion to say, Age of Empires? Halo? MS Flight SImulator? As far as I remember, no. And don't mention those blurbs on Twitter about "major publisher support" which never even came close to mentioning MS or any MS franchise. If you see something along the lines of "system downloading..." THEN you'll know MS is showing up. If not, you're relying on tinfoil hat theories.
high rated
The "stop bitching" people keep skipping over the fact that the DRM free version IS gimped a bit. I wouldn't want a gimped version either.

I say this as someone who generally thinks this is no big deal.
avatar
hedwards: I'm going to be asking for my money back. I backed it because it was DRM free and I really don't care why they can't deliver they should have been honest about it in the first place. I don't think that it's right for me to pay the same price and get less than what the rest of the folks are getting.

If they had a licensing problem that should have been revealed when we had a chance to back out. Taking our money and then changing the terms is not cool. I really don't care what you think, I got taken advantage of.
I was thinking about that for a moment, I've just upped my pledge to collectors box, but after some thinking, I guess I'll take it anyway. First - this apparently might be the only way to get it DRM-free. And second - as someone said, modders will help those who don't want to use Steam. Of course I'm not going to play those DLC for free, I'll just buy them on Steam and search through the net to find a way to use them with my DRM-free copy.
avatar
StingingVelvet: The "stop bitching" people keep skipping over the fact that the DRM free version IS gimped a bit. I wouldn't want a gimped version either.

I say this as someone who generally thinks this is no big deal.
I think the larger issue is the fact that the license wasn't as solid as we would have thought. Granted, this could have been a situation of something unexpected popping up, but the fact that it happened (and had to happen sometime after the kickstarter ended) and we weren't told is what bothers me.

Overall, I can't say I'm too pleased with what Harebrained Schemes (Gee, that name seems a bit...interesting now) did and more importantly, that they never came out and told the backers what was going on in a timely fashion. THAT I'm finding a bit more worrisome (Or maybe I'm spoiled by Project Eternity...so many emails).

I guess, it feels weird that everyone's taken a hardline approach, but sorta missed the thing to really be bothered by (I'm assuming part of the modified licensing agreement requires them to make the second city into DLC for payments, but the fact that they never came clean about it bothers me).
I guess i'll wait for a 'complete edition' on GOG then.
high rated
Some backers pledge in part (often a large part) because they want to push an agenda (DRM-free, Linux, etc.). These are the backers who are disappointed now. Harebrained implied (although it left what it said open to a different interpretation) that there's going to be a DRM-free release for all, and I'm sure some DRM-free proponents backed because of this and feel cheated.

For people for whom DRM-free isn't an agenda, just something they like, the current solution can feel good enough. For people who don't care about DRM there obviously isn't any problem. I imagine many of these people don't understand what the agenda crowd feels, because to them Harebrained delivered as promised.
high rated
avatar
jackalKnight: You had no actual evidence, just "hints". "Hints" don't prove a damn thing.
Did they ever post even the vaguest allusion to say, Age of Empires? Halo? MS Flight SImulator? As far as I remember, no. And don't mention those blurbs on Twitter about "major publisher support" which never even came close to mentioning MS or any MS franchise. If you see something along the lines of "system downloading..." THEN you'll know MS is showing up. If not, you're relying on tinfoil hat theories.
Yes, they prove that they implied that MS might be in bound. All you're doing is making yourself look like an idiot by changing your arguments midstream.

The fact of the matter is that GOG did suggest that MS might be close to a deal to license their game here.
avatar
ET3D: Some backers pledge in part (often a large part) because they want to push an agenda (DRM-free, Linux, etc.). These are the backers who are disappointed now. Harebrained implied (although it left what it said open to a different interpretation) that there's going to be a DRM-free release for all, and I'm sure some DRM-free proponents backed because of this and feel cheated.

For people for whom DRM-free isn't an agenda, just something they like, the current solution can feel good enough. For people who don't care about DRM there obviously isn't any problem. I imagine many of these people don't understand what the agenda crowd feels, because to them Harebrained delivered as promised.
They didn't imply that there would be a DRM free version available of the game and all the DLC, they stated it pretty succinctly in their FAQ that it would be the case.

I personally say the bigger the crapstorm the better, because of the time it's taken to get this far I probably won't get my money back, but I personally won't be buying anything from them ever again.
Post edited April 13, 2013 by hedwards
avatar
ET3D: Some backers pledge in part (often a large part) because they want to push an agenda (DRM-free, Linux, etc.). These are the backers who are disappointed now. Harebrained implied (although it left what it said open to a different interpretation) that there's going to be a DRM-free release for all, and I'm sure some DRM-free proponents backed because of this and feel cheated.

For people for whom DRM-free isn't an agenda, just something they like, the current solution can feel good enough. For people who don't care about DRM there obviously isn't any problem. I imagine many of these people don't understand what the agenda crowd feels, because to them Harebrained delivered as promised.
I understand the position, but from the looks of it, that was a choice that was taken away from Harebrained (Again, I dislike how they communicated this). I'm looking at it trying to figure out exactly what was going on, but the only thing that makes sense is they're either lying through their teeth, or it's a legit issue that came up out of nowhere when they thought they were in the clear. The only thing I can notice is that they're trying, from what appears to be a fairly bad situation, and that things change as time goes on (Which is why a Kickstarter campaign should involve a good deal of updates to the situation on what is happening).
high rated
avatar
Thunderstone: Well, they are honoring their word to provide a drm-free version so they haven't broken their promise. I don't buy their reasons for not including future dlc in the drm-free version, but it is their choice.

Now if they put in artificial measures to specifically prevent people from putting in fancontent or dlc instead of just not supporting it, dick move. But they kept their word.
Considering that they promised to release and sell a DRM free version to people after the KS was over, I'd say that they aren't keeping their word at all. What's more, they had an obligation to tell us that we wouldn't be able to get any future DLC DRM free.

Despite what some folks may think, omission is ultimately a form of lying if the party omitting it has a reasonable expectation that people need the information to make a decision.
avatar
ET3D: Some backers pledge in part (often a large part) because they want to push an agenda (DRM-free, Linux, etc.). These are the backers who are disappointed now. Harebrained implied (although it left what it said open to a different interpretation) that there's going to be a DRM-free release for all, and I'm sure some DRM-free proponents backed because of this and feel cheated.

For people for whom DRM-free isn't an agenda, just something they like, the current solution can feel good enough. For people who don't care about DRM there obviously isn't any problem. I imagine many of these people don't understand what the agenda crowd feels, because to them Harebrained delivered as promised.
You nailed my sentiments about the whole shabang.
high rated
I take a comment in kickstarter page....

Grzegorz Koczyk

People are assuming DRM is about backers having it DRM-free. It isn't - it is and always was about EVERYONE being able to get it DRM-free, uncrippled. This is why Kickstarter matters for some of us older geeks, because it is a way of giving back to the world. This is why there is a Wikipedia, why there are multiple open source projects on the web and why there are donations made for public schools and public art museums in most countries.

HBS should have told people that negotiations were ongoing, upfront. We would likely have backed anyway (out of love for Shadowrun and trust for the guys who created it), but would not feel misinformed. Personally, I am not mad with them, but I am quite disappointed.

Trust is a scarce commodity, operating mostly on credit. HBS depleted a portion of this credit and that will make things harder for other awesome projects.

This +100
I will never ever back a single project again even for the CD Projekt RED developer

source : http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/1613260297/shadowrun-returns/posts/453037#comments
Post edited April 13, 2013 by yinan
avatar
hedwards: They didn't imply that there would be a DRM free version available of the game and all the DLC, they stated it pretty succinctly in their FAQ that it would be the case.
Stating things succinctly is a good way to leaving them open to interpretation. :) "For PC/Mac/Linux, the game will be available DRM-free from our website" can have the interpretation of "for backers", and still be left true. The DRM-free download is fully featured, contains all the content which was promised as part of the Kickstarter, the editor and the ability to share user-created content. So Hairbrained is giving away what it promised.
avatar
hedwards: They didn't imply that there would be a DRM free version available of the game and all the DLC, they stated it pretty succinctly in their FAQ that it would be the case.
avatar
ET3D: Stating things succinctly is a good way to leaving them open to interpretation. :) "For PC/Mac/Linux, the game will be available DRM-free from our website" can have the interpretation of "for backers", and still be left true. The DRM-free download is fully featured, contains all the content which was promised as part of the Kickstarter, the editor and the ability to share user-created content. So Hairbrained is giving away what it promised.
Well no, the DRM free version isn't fully featured if you can't load future DLC into it. It takes a bit of squinting to interpret it as such when it's not even going to be for sale on their site anymore.

I'll have to dig up those FAQ entries, but my computer right now won't open them when I click the links for some reason. But, they were pretty explicit about it. The comments section has reposted the original statements a few times.