I think Stephen King cause he would bring transparency, would end the fed and protect civil liberties.

Guybrush Threepwood!

Not familiar with Alex Jones, so Stephen King it is.

Alex Jones, because he's not a slave to the NWO.

Man, I love pointless threads!

Personally, my vote would go to Harlan Ellison. He's just grumpy enough and crazy enough to get shit done.

Erm ... neither?

I don't know Alex Jones. Wikipedia describes him as a right.wing conspiracy theorist and self-described paleoconservative. Doesn't look like someone who could do any good as a president.

Stephen King is an author whose worlds very often follow the same rules: There's something that's very cruel and clearly evil, then there are the "good guys", and extreme violence is seen as an acceptable method by the good guys to kill the evil. This is way too similar to the recent failed US attempts at foreign politics to make him look like a good candidate.

Also, Marzooker, how many of these rather pointless threads are you planning to create? We _do_ have a "drunk thread" to contain those members of the community who become talkative under the influence ... ;)

Ray Bradbury!

Gaahl!!!!

What makes a better bowl of soup? A kick to the balls or a pool stick to the adam's apple?

This is the pointless question thread right?

Well if you lack said balls, that works. Otherwise, I'd rather take the latter attack. I don't want that pain for a long time.

...does vomit count as soup?

it has a point. the point is who would be a better president.

What a bizarre choice.

Neither. I know nothing about how they would govern, so why would I choose either of them?

I wouldn't blame you for not choosing either of them. trust me, i wouldn't either. I just wanted to see what kinds of answers people would come up with. :D

Heh, Stephhen King, I guess... he's got an heart of a little boy, after all!