Posted January 22, 2012
Actually he was. It was more subtle but he definitely was a child killer/possible child molester. That's why they burned him to death in the first place.
Posted January 22, 2012
No. He wasn't. HE. WASN'T. He was a child killer, NOT a child abuser.
Post edited January 22, 2012 by Foxhack
Posted January 22, 2012
Yep he was. The parents killed him for stealing their kids. They changed the details of how he did it in the remakes but yeah he definitely did it.
Posted January 22, 2012
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freddy_Krueger
...Krueger was the groundskeeper at Badham Preschool and a child molester (a recycled idea that was abandoned by director Craven himself while making the 1984 original).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Nightmare_on_Elm_Street#Development
See that? He wasn't a child molester in the original movies.
Post edited January 22, 2012 by Foxhack
Posted January 22, 2012
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freddy_Krueger
...Krueger was the groundskeeper at Badham Preschool and a child molester (a recycled idea that was abandoned by director Craven himself while making the 1984 original).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Nightmare_on_Elm_Street#Development
See that? He wasn't a child molester in the original movies.
BTW why are you so hung up on a silly joke in an offtopic thread for? 0.o
Relax and have a glass of chocolate milk with us, yes?
Post edited January 22, 2012 by GameRager
Posted January 25, 2012
You know you have been playing too many video games when during a TV show a guy fires a single shot from a full clip, and you sit there wondering why he isn't reloading afterword. After about a minute and half of confusion, I finally remembered that it doesn't make any sense to change a nearly full clip in real life. Its extra embarrassing for me, as that is one of my biggest complaints about video games. Many a time have I argued that I should loose all those bullets, since my guy obviously isn't refilling clips as I play.
Posted January 25, 2012
Posted January 25, 2012
I finally got an awesome sports coat for interviews and teaching. Behold!
I think this is the first time in over a year I've actually been excited about clothes I purchased. This coat is nearly invulnerable - perfect for a middle school science teacher.
Oh, and for the first time in a week I think I'll be done with my work early enough to sit down and play a video game for a bit. FOR THE EMPEROR!
I think this is the first time in over a year I've actually been excited about clothes I purchased. This coat is nearly invulnerable - perfect for a middle school science teacher.
Oh, and for the first time in a week I think I'll be done with my work early enough to sit down and play a video game for a bit. FOR THE EMPEROR!
Post edited January 25, 2012 by Runehamster
Posted January 25, 2012
I think this is the first time in over a year I've actually been excited about clothes I purchased. This coat is nearly invulnerable - perfect for a middle school science teacher.
Oh, and for the first time in a week I think I'll be done with my work early enough to sit down and play a video game for a bit. FOR THE EMPEROR!
What did you pay for the coat? Got a good deal I hope?
Posted January 25, 2012
There was a fantastic article in the Economist on euphemisms about a month ago, have a read here:
http://www.economist.com/node/21541767
Anyway, in this week's issue there was a funny little reader's letter:
"SIR - Your article on euphemisms ("Making murder respectable", December 17th) brought to mind the following crime report:
She was decapitated and disembowelled. She was however not interfered with."
http://www.economist.com/node/21541767
Anyway, in this week's issue there was a funny little reader's letter:
"SIR - Your article on euphemisms ("Making murder respectable", December 17th) brought to mind the following crime report:
She was decapitated and disembowelled. She was however not interfered with."