It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
Delixe: As for the Human reaper I highly doubt anyone lived on in the embryo. Harbinger was being literal when saying they would live on, what he meant was a new Reaper would be born so elements of humanity would be incorporated into the Reapers but the ones who made it were nothing but genetic goo. It was an abomination that did kill hundreds of thousands of humans to create so Shepard did the right thing. I can't imagine Paragon or Renegade Shep letting that thing live.
They just had so many opportunities to make something deep and meaningful. This could have been GOLD: talk about the slave/GOD theme already evoked in ME1. Those collectors were protheans at some point, they're now slaves. The Collector General is used like a stuffed puppet by Harbinger. They help another species to go live among the GODs, a huge privilege is granted (it seems) to humanity but humanity chooses to live among the slaves (well, Shepard it seems at least). If only we could have had more information on the collectors, maybe we could have found a way to release them to their free will (which is illusion I know I know bla bla I'm harbinger...) creating some sort of uprise perhaps or even taken the Reaper's offer on joining them... were the Reapers to be afraid of what such an uprising with creatures being able to handle their technology could possibly mean.
All this could have been (should have been) reflected on Shepard's character: will he/she handle the situation like Saren? If you persuaded Saren at the end to join the slaves of his own how does this effect (:D) Shepard's behaviour and decisions? He/She is a wall... other people never leave a lasting impression on Shepard, therefore it makes it hard for me to care about any of this. The reaper invasion just looks like a big Summerevent that will eventually go away and have the characters go back to their usual business/lifes afterwards... maybe I'm overanalysing stuff.
Yes, in ME1 I really liked how they detailed Saren's motives. It made his actions much more understandable. Actually, at some point I was almost sorry for him. And at other times, I wondered if Saren's action were not a better way to "save" the galaxy (or at least, to ease the inevitable invasion/occupation of the galaxy). Sure, Shep' is trying to prevent the invasion. But if he fails, the galaxy is doomed. Saren does not try to prevent anything, he's trying to make the invasion less painful, or at least that's what he thinks. It's understandable.
avatar
Nnexxus: Saren does not try to prevent anything, he's trying to make the invasion less painful, or at least that's what he thinks. It's understandable.
Well, it has less to do with being painful or not but more to do with getting swept away from the face of time and space or getting the opportunity to have the genepool live on forever. As a GOD. (as long as that is the true story behind the Reaper's motives)

A funny sidenote: collector general and Shepard are alike in that they're manipulated into fulfilling their master's wishes (Harbinger, TIM) (also if you count Shepard's general stiffness and mortar brick attitude as a feature of the game). The only time where Shepard gets the choice to take a stand against TIM is the endgame decision of keeping or blowing up the base. I wonder if the Collector's general incompetence is to some extent due to the General's sneaky interventions or sheer will...
If you end up destroying the base it points to Shep and Gen taking an active stand against their overseer... that's how I see it. Die free or live as a slave, huh?
Otherwise a Saren/Sovereign situationarises (continues) with Cerberus(TIM) and Shepard, ok you might have a technological edge over the Reapers but all the sweet talks about morality/dying free go to the hounds. It's even worse for renegades getting used like gullible henchmen.
Post edited December 13, 2010 by pops117
Sovereign states in the very first game that "each is an independent nation" or something like that. Basically, each Reaper is it's own "society", and can live out it's entire existence without ever having to interact with another Reaper, or any other "intelligent" being for that matter. It's like, Galactus and Unicron and Cthulu aren't part of some "Coalition of World Rapers", since they're powerful enough on their own to function separately from the rest of creation.
avatar
StonerMk2: Nah, that is just how EA does business.
avatar
Crassmaster: Not usually to this degree. I can't actually remember the last year that a major publisher was planning to release the sheer number of legit AAA type titles in one year as EA is set to put out right now in 2011.
Well potential AAA titles. EA has a habit of screwing up their major franchises, or perhaps i have just been burned by them too many times to count in regards to the C&C series.
Post edited December 13, 2010 by StonerMk2
avatar
Crassmaster: Okay, does EA have evidence to support that the world is going to end in 2012? They're launching pretty much every major title they have in the works next year now!
You'll probably see an MMO version of every major AAA title they have now. Maybe even Theme Hospital: The MMO Sim.
avatar
Crassmaster: Okay, does EA have evidence to support that the world is going to end in 2012? They're launching pretty much every major title they have in the works next year now!
avatar
cw8: You'll probably see an MMO version of every major AAA title they have now. Maybe even Theme Hospital: The MMO Sim.
That sounds slightly better than one would think.
You're in charge of changing the bedpans.
Mass Effect is in fact. quite a good universe to set a MMO. You can choose to be an asari, a turian, salarian, batarian, human, quarian, etc. You can become a spectre if u are good, a CSEC guard, a merc, a smuggler, etc. The moderators of each server are the council (LOL)
avatar
LittleLizard: The moderators of each server are the council (LOL)
Ah yes, "Spambots"... we have dismissed this claim.
But...what if you chose the Renegade option at the ending of Mass Effect 1?
Post edited December 14, 2010 by Aaron86
avatar
Aaron86: But...what if you chose the Renegade option at the ending of Mass Effect 1?
Find out in Mass Effect 2.
According to PC Gamer, Mass Effect 3 needs an Elcor teammate on board of the Normandy. And here's why :

http://www.pcgamer.com/2010/12/14/why-mass-effect-3-needs-an-elcor-team-mate/

Yes. Yes. Oh God, Yes.
avatar
xa_chan: According to PC Gamer, Mass Effect 3 needs an Elcor teammate on board of the Normandy. And here's why :

http://www.pcgamer.com/2010/12/14/why-mass-effect-3-needs-an-elcor-team-mate/

Yes. Yes. Oh God, Yes.
That's so, so wrong. I will only allow that in if we finally get that Hanar Spectre we have longed for. Thane said they can be lethal in combat.
avatar
xa_chan: According to PC Gamer, Mass Effect 3 needs an Elcor teammate on board of the Normandy. And here's why :

http://www.pcgamer.com/2010/12/14/why-mass-effect-3-needs-an-elcor-team-mate/

Yes. Yes. Oh God, Yes.
avatar
Delixe: That's so, so wrong. I will only allow that in if we finally get that Hanar Spectre we have longed for. Thane said they can be lethal in combat.
not only that. Zaeed was almost choked to death by one! If they can take on zaeed, they can be HUGELY POWERFUL!