It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
dedoporno: It sure beats risking a Townie lynch. The question is, could it be beneficial to wait until the deadline and see what else may come up and only then seal the lynch?
This is actually my thinking.

Get plenty of time for everyone to give full thoughts, get time for a replacement player to hack his way through ~1000 posts, and just stay loose and have fun with it for a few days.
avatar
adaliabooks: I won't vote yet, to see what everyone else thinks, but I'm in favour of just getting rid of RWarehall (sorry)
avatar
dedoporno: It sure beats risking a Townie lynch. The question is, could it be beneficial to wait until the deadline and see what else may come up and only then seal the lynch?
I... don't know how to answer this without spoiling any effect of waiting...
avatar
dedoporno: It sure beats risking a Townie lynch. The question is, could it be beneficial to wait until the deadline and see what else may come up and only then seal the lynch?
I would think it would be more beneficial to wait until closer to the deadline. It would give us a bit more time to see if anything or anyone else stands out. You can still lynch RWarehall, if you wish, closer to the deadline. Out of curiosity, what would the benefits be of lynching him now? Other than starting night time sooner?
avatar
ddickinson: You can still lynch RWarehall, if you wish, closer to the deadline.
We can, but I can't say I appreciate you saying this.
avatar
ddickinson: I would think it would be more beneficial to wait until closer to the deadline. It would give us a bit more time to see if anything or anyone else stands out. You can still lynch RWarehall, if you wish, closer to the deadline. Out of curiosity, what would the benefits be of lynching him now? Other than starting night time sooner?
We can? Are we counting you out?
avatar
adaliabooks: I won't vote yet, to see what everyone else thinks, but I'm in favour of just getting rid of RWarehall (sorry)
avatar
dedoporno: It sure beats risking a Townie lynch. The question is, could it be beneficial to wait until the deadline and see what else may come up and only then seal the lynch?
Unless we can guarantee a mafia lynch, RW has to be who is lynched today. He is anti-town, and we have no way of knowing if he is being truthful or not about his role and abilities. I do lean toward believing him, but then I also believed he was town.

Vote RWarehall
I would slow our roll on the votes for now, please.

In fact,

Unvote RWarehall

For all the reasons I already stated. Once everyone gets a full chance to contribute, we can lynch, but please not before.
avatar
dedoporno: It sure beats risking a Townie lynch. The question is, could it be beneficial to wait until the deadline and see what else may come up and only then seal the lynch?
avatar
ddickinson: I would think it would be more beneficial to wait until closer to the deadline. It would give us a bit more time to see if anything or anyone else stands out. You can still lynch RWarehall, if you wish, closer to the deadline. Out of curiosity, what would the benefits be of lynching him now? Other than starting night time sooner?
I don't like the wording of "you can", why exclude yourself? This seems like a slip up in wording, the same as Dedo did before.
avatar
yogsloth: I would slow our roll on the votes for now, please.

In fact,

Unvote RWarehall

For all the reasons I already stated. Once everyone gets a full chance to contribute, we can lynch, but please not before.
Yeah, I think we need to give crew (or her replacement) time to catch up while there's not too many posts.
avatar
dedoporno: We can, but I can't say I appreciate you saying this.
avatar
yogsloth: We can? Are we counting you out?
avatar
trentonlf: I don't like the wording of "you can", why exclude yourself? This seems like a slip up in wording, the same as Dedo did before.
You are reading too much into what I said. The reason I worded it that way is because I have not voted, yet. I have not decided who to vote for, though I am thinking people may be right about RWarehall. But as I have not voted yet, I worded it you, rather than we. If I had voted him, or was 100% certain I will vote for RWarehall, then I would say us/we etc. If you wish to read something more into that, then that's up to you. But you are simply looking for something that isn't there.
avatar
ddickinson: I have not decided who to vote for, though I am thinking people may be right about RWarehall.
"People"... may be right about RWarehall.... WHO HAS SELF-CLAIMED SERIAL KILLER?

I guess you can let us know when you've weighed all that evidence and come to a conclusion, mmm kay?
avatar
yogsloth: "People"... may be right about RWarehall.... WHO HAS SELF-CLAIMED SERIAL KILLER?

I guess you can let us know when you've weighed all that evidence and come to a conclusion, mmm kay?
So just because he has come out as a self-confessed serial killer, and just becomes SOME of the members think he should be lynched, does that mean I side with them without thinking things through? Do you expect me to join the wagon against RWarehall, just because some think he is the prime suspect to be lynched?

It's strange how some people choose to question my wording so much, is that just because I have not joined in and voted, or expressed willingness to vote for RWarehall just yet?
avatar
ddickinson: So just because he has come out as a self-confessed serial killer, and just becomes SOME of the members think he should be lynched, does that mean I side with them without thinking things through? Do you expect me to join the wagon against RWarehall, just because some think he is the prime suspect to be lynched?

It's strange how some people choose to question my wording so much, is that just because I have not joined in and voted, or expressed willingness to vote for RWarehall just yet?
I do not think it is a matter of if he should be lynched (the answer there should be yes as he is a self claimed serial killer- and in the end his win condition is to kill everyone) but a bit more of when should he by lynched and is it beneficial to keep him around longer than day one.
avatar
Sage103082: I do not think it is a matter of if he should be lynched (the answer there should be yes as he is a self claimed serial killer- and in the end his win condition is to kill everyone) but a bit more of when should he by lynched and is it beneficial to keep him around longer than day one.
That is what I was thinking. If he is telling the truth, then we already know he is a threat, and he can be lynched at any time. Why not try to find the Scum instead, find those who we are still unsure about. At least give it until the deadline to see what we can find out, rather than just jumping on RWarehall.

(Hello, Sage! My first real game related interaction with you in a Mafia game. Vote Sage :-). Only joking, sorry for being silly.)