Posted January 02, 2015
trentonlf: What reasons would you give for a no lynch that the scum could not use to their advantage?
Two roles. Watchers and Trackers. If the cops must be blocked, that means someone visits them. A Watcher can see who consistently visits our Cops, and a tracker may also find someone who visited either a victim, or one of the cops. We may already have such info, though revealing it at this point would be premature, because the data is inconclusive.
trentonlf: This seemed to be laying a foundation to later push a no lynch. If we were guaranteed no flip ever on a lynch I would agree to a no lynch if we were not sure the person being lynched was scum. But, we there is nothing saying there will never be a flip on lynches and if we go forward thinking we can't lynch anyone that enables the scum to manipulate the situation more than normal.
And of course I'm laying the foundation to later suggest a no lynch. I want people to think about the possibility, then depending on what later lynches reveal (or don't reveal), evaluate and decide for themselves if a No Lynch is a good choice or not. But some people pretend to know better than others and declare there's only one correct course. What does that say about them I wonder?