After baz's remark, it seems like a generic win condition.
Ah, ok. I was thinking that if you had some other hint about the factions, this might help explain why you were adament that the case against nmillar was flimsy.
MY BRAIN HURTS. D:
There's been so much intense discussion on three different subjects (Post 39, Rod & Baz (ohhhhhh dear...), Damnation vs itai.sharim (enough walls of text to build a house)) that I'm struggling to make sense of all the chains of posts. I'm preparing my take on it all, but I don't want to dump the cans right now because it'll distract us and spill worms all over the place...
@Itai: It looks like you're the one that got yourself into this mess... Responding point by point to Damnation's read on you (he said you were 'leaning mafia' - you weren't even one of his strong suspects) makes it look like you got spooked and decided to counter-attack.
After that every little thing you've said came under the microscope, and some of it does look kind of weird e.g.
- persistantly fighting the case on nmillar with "it's flawed reasoning" when actually your take on it is different to Damnation's ;
- OMGUS vote on Damn ;
- "Why is day 2 any better?" ;
- criticising for quoting half-sentences ;
- praising the benefits of full information one second then wondering if Rod should take his info "to the grave" the next...
A lot of this apparent evidence could simply be your playing style. But you've been pretty defensive, for no readily available reason, and there are contradictions left right and centre.
Current more serious but extremely tentative reads:
Leaning scum: Joe, Vitek, itai, (the former two for casually dropping speculations)
Leaning town: rod, baz (I think that's too much of a coherant mess to be a mafia ploy - remember the scum haven't had time to discuss and work things out yet)
No clue: the rest of you :p