Hmm. I'm struggling with the other Mason - I can't figure out if it would be a good idea if they revealed themselves at this point... On one hand we desperately need some hard information, but on the other they might be more use in deflecting if they stay anon.
NotFrenchYet/pazzer: Bringing back up a discussion that was dropped under the agreement that it was only helping mafia by the people involved is pretty suspicious to me.
Fair point. For the record:
- I got involved at first because it was the first moment of significant activity, before anyone realised it should proably have been meta-game.
- I brought up the argument for the second time after reading something on the wiki which suggested it might have been a mafia ploy to distance by targetting each other - concern and enthusiasm effectively overrode anything anyone had said about "only helping the mafia".
- Bard has just (#259) referred to it again for that reason, which is why I also mentioned it. Since you took the time to reply to him as well, I'm puzzled as to why you didn't include Bard with me and pazzer.
For the record 2:
I now know, thanks to my research, that targeting posts based on semantics is not a good way to play this game, not least because English is not everyone's native language. Since that's where my suspicions came from, I'm currently happy to let that sleeping dog lie. (It's still possible it'll wake up and bite me in the arse though, as I'm aware my actions created some rope...)
In the interests of getting things moving: Vote Primal
, for the moment, because a) I find it interesting that you voted for Orry to put him at L-2 and draw the claim despite knowing that baz could easily have built a similar case for yourself, and b) I'd like to see if Joe reacts to muttly's accidental edit before I push any more on Orry.
I actually slept badly because all of this was fluttering around in my head so much. I won't be staying up that late to go over things anymore..! Dangerous for my health :p