Has it occurred to you that, having realised that night 2 was a shared dream, he could easily claim to have shared the dream that Twilight had already described.....
Night 3 dream, not night 2. Night 2 (and night 1) don't seem to be shared so far. Make of that what you will, though I did first post a comment about it on post 1611
. Not the most decipherable comment, but I was really surprised to see the red fishheads make an appearance there. Also, I am pushing for the dreams from day 2, since as I said before, some people were expecting night flavour, some weren't, thus I was accused of role-fishing. Will try to find time to dig up those posts tomorrow.
Actually, what I don't get is the assumption that the mafia doesn't have these dreams, if they are shared ?
The assumption isn't that the mafia doesn't get those dreams, the assumption is that only people without a night action (either theirs, or targeted by one) get those dreams. I do find it weird that 3 people shared the same dream, especially since we haven't had anything to support such a thing so far.
Also, I draw attention to this:
Well, I was hoping to cleverly read individual stuff in these dream descriptions. If they turn out to be collective and impersonal, I'll be a bit disappointed (and ridiculous).
Could it be that you were doing something during night 3, thus not getting the same dream? Of course, assuming that only people that did nothing got that dream, that means 8 people were doing something.
One was killing Krypsyn, one was setting fire to Damnation house, 2 were using their abilities, 2 were targetted by those abilities. That leaves 2 we don't know (yet) what they were doing.
I think we should be able to end this during day 5, or day 6 at the most.
Not sure how much sense I make, too tired at the moment to think it properly. Let me sleep on it and see if something comes out.