I'd like a ask yet another poll question, although too few players are active to answer it.
Rodzaju said : "I would suggest that Telika was not poisoned, purely on the basis that he is not dead!"
and Krypsyn interpreted it as Rodzaju accusing me of lying, while Robbeasy interpreted it as Rodzaju assuming my interpretation of flavor had been wrong.
What was YOUR (yes, YOURS, reader, the same YOU as the other time) spontaneous interpretation of Rodzaju's comment ?
Damnation was quite active
in the protection of Rodzaju against Nmillar's post. This is interesting because it makes me assume that NMillar and Damnation are, then, not BOTH mafia.
Krypsyn claims that Rodzaju is "neither a fool nor an idiot"
and therefore has, at worst, a plan. I would like confirmation of that, while we're at omg-the-other-players-are-so-dumb. Actually, it's a point I wanted to make earlier : if mafioso, the snake+damnation thing sounds sloppy and improvised. Those who have played with Rodzaju : shall we expect sloppy-and-improvised mafia plans from him, or carefully crafted and planned ones ?
SirPrimalform posted "I'm not sure. How specific was Telika's flavour saying he was poisoned? I was under the impression that he just thought he'd eaten something funny, so it seems possible he was never poisoned to begin with?"
. But I had confirmed quite clearly
(in my opinion) that I had been explicitely healed by a poisinong made explicit. So coming back to the "mislead flavour interpretation" theory is a bit odd to me.
Also, this post
could be many things. From nothing, to 3rd party thief pinning robbery on mafia. But one subtle thing would be the implied -true or false- idea of Damnation being townie because robbed by the mafia to fund night action. Depending on reads and opinions on game mechanisms (coins, robbery, actions) it can fuel different affiliation assumptions. But the point for me is : should
either Damnation or SirPrimalform flip mafia at some point, then there might be a subtle reason to re-read this post.