It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
SirPrimalform: Did anyone pick up on Unknown's unvote? What's more interesting is that it has a specific place in the time line: It happened between posts 506 and 542. It's possible that whoever it is is voting by PM and the place in that list simply states the chronology, or it could be that the vote is placed using a breadcrumb or something. I'm far too lazy to check, but that's something to look for if anyone is feeling analytical.
If they are voting by PM, I can't track it.
If it is by breadcrumb, those that posted in this period are:
Vitek
SirPrimalform
Rodzaju
Twilightbard
Detlik
Stoicsentry
Robbeasy
Red_Baron
NotFrenchYet.
I'll have a closer look at those posts, but generally I don't notice breadcrumbs until they are pointed out to me, which is why I suspect them to be everywhere....
I don't know if this has already been checked - but is it possible that the vote doesn't really belong to anyone in particular, but works only for the most recent poster who did not "unvote" before placing their vote?

Honestly that double vote was weird no matter who placed it because it was the only vote for the person in question. So it seems neither scummy nor even sensible.
avatar
stoicsentry: Screw it, the lurking is getting out of control and people apparently aren't willing to call Damuna on her bluff so,

Unvote Damuna, Vote PenutBrittle
Frustrating, isn't it?

;-}
avatar
Rodzaju: I believe (As Nmillar pointed out) that Vitek also voted SPF at about the same time as me.
With the lack of any info to the contrary, I would assume for more or less the same reason....
avatar
Vitek: See for yourself.
Sorry to you both, I simply hit the RVS period and went 'Ok, this is getting me nowhere' since I thought that the vote would have some more meaning by now.

On the unvote, I think it's safe to say that it's via PM, because the only person who could have placed the vote would be NotFrenchYet if we were using the timing of when it was placed.
Seriously, some poeple really need strong prod or replacement. At least Detlik and Penut are posting elsewhere on forum but just ignore this game!
I am starting to dislike this game and not because the game itself but because players.
Can the mod confirm that Damuna and PenutBrittle have asked to be replaced? Your earlier post seemed to imply this.
avatar
nmillar: Can the mod confirm that Damuna and PenutBrittle have asked to be replaced? Your earlier post seemed to imply this.
He mentioned Damuna and pazzer. Pazzer announced it long ago it would be better if he gets replaced because he doesn't have time to play but he will try to return by the end of next week (posted on the 2nd of March).
avatar
Vitek: He mentioned Damuna and pazzer. Pazzer announced it long ago it would be better if he gets replaced because he doesn't have time to play but he will try to return by the end of next week (posted on the 2nd of March).
Ah, okay. Posting from work so have very limited time with the browser open. ;)
Hum, far from back up to speed just skimmed the last few pages. Find this unknown voter interesting. As not encountered anything like it before. Curious why the votes for unknown redirected to no lynch. Possibly a catch all for votes placed on people not in the game.

May as well test that theory now vote Damnation
avatar
Vitek: Seriously, some poeple really need strong prod or replacement. At least Detlik and Penut are posting elsewhere on forum but just ignore this game!
I am starting to dislike this game and not because the game itself but because players.
Sorry, but I don't post here for two reasons. First I am busy at school (I hope it will resolve itself soon) and I have barely enough time to manage my giveaway. And second, this is my first Mafia game. I read the posts but if I would reply it would be something like : Huh, ok, I agree and stuff like that. If you want to see that kind of posts from me, okay sure, I will do it, but I would prefer to reply once I will have something to actually share.
Doesn't appear like Pazzer is aware that he is looking for a replacement? Hope he sticks around as said earlier.

Hope you won't dislike it too much Vitek, I have enjoyed some of the stuff happening so far - yet there is a bit too much lurking around.

avatar
Detlik: I read the posts but if I would reply it would be something like : Huh, ok, I agree and stuff like that. If you want to see that kind of posts from me, okay sure, I will do it, but I would prefer to reply once I will have something to actually share.
Well a post where you state that you agree with certain theories is useful as well. Helps judging people and informs us that your active. Understandable with time troubles.
avatar
Red_Baron: Doesn't appear like Pazzer is aware that he is looking for a replacement? Hope he sticks around as said earlier.

Hope you won't dislike it too much Vitek, I have enjoyed some of the stuff happening so far - yet there is a bit too much lurking around.

avatar
Detlik: I read the posts but if I would reply it would be something like : Huh, ok, I agree and stuff like that. If you want to see that kind of posts from me, okay sure, I will do it, but I would prefer to reply once I will have something to actually share.
avatar
Red_Baron: Well a post where you state that you agree with certain theories is useful as well. Helps judging people and informs us that your active. Understandable with time troubles.
Indeed - alternatively, if you don't understand a particular point that one of us is on about, asking us to elaborate would be good input as well - helps you learn what's going on, and also has the useful slight possibility of you pointing out something which, when analysed more closely by an experienced player, changes from "Confusing" to "Incriminating". :P
avatar
Detlik: Sorry, but I don't post here for two reasons. First I am busy at school (I hope it will resolve itself soon) and I have barely enough time to manage my giveaway. And second, this is my first Mafia game. I read the posts but if I would reply it would be something like : Huh, ok, I agree and stuff like that. If you want to see that kind of posts from me, okay sure, I will do it, but I would prefer to reply once I will have something to actually share.
What others said. Also it helps us to catch you in case you are scum. ;-)
Although it is not enforced much there is rule that each player should post at least every 48 hours. Do you want to break rules? Do you? It may happen that once you finally have something to say you'll be already replaced. :-/
avatar
Detlik: And second, this is my first Mafia game. I read the posts but if I would reply it would be something like : Huh, ok, I agree and stuff like that. If you want to see that kind of posts from me, okay sure, I will do it, but I would prefer to reply once I will have something to actually share.
My main argument, is the only way you're gonna develop in the game, is to post, ask questions, show us how you're looking at things, etc... The biggest flaw to staying quiet, is you also look like you're trying to avoid the radar completely.

I generally think that we should give newbies a benefit of the doubt, but if you say, start posting a lot come day 2 and farther, it does strike me that you were waiting until there were targets that the town could be talked into lynching instead of looking for scum.
Okay then, I will ask a lot of questions, but dont come whining when you will be over-questionized :D