It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
xzyem: 4. They are a double voter, where the second vote is hidden -> They are probably town, and (if that is the only ability they have) should come clean.
I think this is the most likely scenario; if the double / secret voter was scum, it wouldn't make sense to reveal that ability so early in the game.
avatar
xzyem: 2. They can't vote normally (at least while having the "secret" vote on) -> we should test for this.
I believe the only player to have NOT voted normally is Detlik.
avatar
nmillar: I think this is the most likely scenario; if the double / secret voter was scum, it wouldn't make sense to reveal that ability so early in the game.
I'm not sure I agree, as a scum with that ability, especially if they are unknown, could reveal it like this to make us run around like chickens. I don't think we have enough information to even wager a guess at the alignment of the person, nevermind who it is.
I second the request for a votecount.

I'm leaning more and more toward voting for Damuna, but I don't want to accidently hammer her.
At the moment I think we're being crippled by non-participation of a significant number of players...

I've not been at my most prolific myself, but there seems to be a core of 5-6 who regularly contribute, and a LOT of lurkers...
avatar
Robbeasy: At the moment I think we're being crippled by non-participation of a significant number of players...

I've not been at my most prolific myself, but there seems to be a core of 5-6 who regularly contribute, and a LOT of lurkers...
Frustratingly enough, this seems to be becoming a trend in these games.....
People who have posted in the last 3 days (starting from "posted 2 days ago"):

Vitek
Rodzaju
SirPrimalform
NotFrenchYet
StoicSentry
QuadrAlien
Red_Baron
jefequeso
xzyem
nmillar
TwilightBard
Robbeasy
avatar
SirPrimalform: People who have posted in the last 3 days (starting from "posted 2 days ago"):
Yeah, but how many of those posted anything actually useful to the game?
Vitek
QuadrAlien
Xzyem
Rodzaju
nmillar
TwilightBard
stoicsentry
Red_Baron
NotFrenchYet
Jefequeso
SirPrimalform last posted anything of substance 3 days ago
Robbeasy last posted anything of substance 3 days ago
Detlik last posted 4 days ago, but it has been 7 days since anything of any use.
Damuna last posted 5 days ago
Penutbrittle last posted 9 days ago
Pazzer last posted 10 days ago.
I wasn't disagreeing with you, but...

avatar
Rodzaju: SirPrimalform last posted anything of substance 3 days ago
...you have a point.
avatar
Rodzaju: Yeah, but how many of those posted anything actually useful to the game?
Vitek
QuadrAlien
Xzyem
Rodzaju
nmillar
TwilightBard
stoicsentry
Red_Baron
NotFrenchYet
Jefequeso
SirPrimalform last posted anything of substance 3 days ago
Robbeasy last posted anything of substance 3 days ago
Detlik last posted 4 days ago, but it has been 7 days since anything of any use.
Damuna last posted 5 days ago
Penutbrittle last posted 9 days ago
Pazzer last posted 10 days ago.
Should I point out that I find that post very very subjective to your own opinion?? Stoic have tried to point several things out, unlike what I've seen from Detlik. QuadAlien made a good point, Damuna said she would be gone some days and most of the remaining of those who have posted recently have been what I would say participating and commenting/posting theories about game - Posting theories and reads is what I would call substance in a game of mafia, of course the substance could always be more specific, roleclaims, night-actions and so on - But obviously thats not the substance your talking about . Since that you for some reason apparently disagree with it and without knowing your definition of "substance" I find it very hard to take any credibility in that post of yours.

So to sum up: I kinda need to know how you define substance before being able to judge your post.
avatar
Red_Baron: Should I point out that I find that post very very subjective to your own opinion?? Stoic have tried to point several things out, unlike what I've seen from Detlik. QuadAlien made a good point, Damuna said she would be gone some days and most of the remaining of those who have posted recently have been what I would say participating and commenting/posting theories about game - Posting theories and reads is what I would call substance in a game of mafia, of course the substance could always be more specific, roleclaims, night-actions and so on - But obviously thats not the substance your talking about . Since that you for some reason apparently disagree with it and without knowing your definition of "substance" I find it very hard to take any credibility in that post of yours.

So to sum up: I kinda need to know how you define substance before being able to judge your post.
Eh? You are defending people that he listed as contributing, no not-contributing.

I agree that inactivity of many players is crippling us severely. It's hard to achieve anything with more than 1/3 players not posting anything substantial.

I get that Damuna and pazzer at least announced they won't be inactive but the others didn't. Penut was very prolific poster in Game 10 and here he just disappeared. Also it is really so hard to at least check-in form time to time?
avatar
Red_Baron: So to sum up: I kinda need to know how you define substance before being able to judge your post.
My idea of 'non-substantive' posts would include discussion of SPF's instrument & hair, Detlik's "The Drumstick did it" and other posts that add absolutley nothing to the game except to say "Look, I am posting..."
unvote, vote Penutbrittle

He is active elsewhere on GOG, he just ignores this game. During last game he posted a lot.
avatar
Rodzaju: My idea of 'non-substantive' posts would include discussion of SPF's instrument & hair,
You were the other person in that conversation! And I still can't work out whether you were rolefishing or not.
avatar
Rodzaju: My idea of 'non-substantive' posts would include discussion of SPF's instrument & hair,
avatar
SirPrimalform: You were the other person in that conversation! And I still can't work out whether you were rolefishing or not.
I have been in most of these non-contributive conversations, but I have also make (what I consider) useful posts.
My issue is with those who do not contribute.

I was not role fishing.
I was suggesting (not very seriously) that you couldn't be at the festival to perform, so perhaps you were there to prevent others performing....
;-}