Well seems to me like the whole argument between Vitek and nmillar doesn't really lead anywhere. Mostly just accusations targeting the other, with no real case other than the accusations behind them. Admitted though that one could see voting pattern, but as Vitek already said, the reasons for them don't really seem to be a plan of an overall scheme and if they were both scum I don't really see how two experienced players would do something that fairly obvious on purpose. On the other side of the argument I see pretty much nmillar doing what nmillar does: Find something by someone to pick on until it either lays an golden egg or is let of the hook. I don't really record the strategy to have worked of yet (I might easily just have forgotten if it has) and I can so far only recall on sure hit by nmillar, where he was himself the scum. There however he didn't really seem to do that much of his aim, shoot and risk missing tactic. Meaning I have him down as leaning town as well.
Your content has been pretty orthodox so far (and perceptive). It's the unorthodox ones that I'm filing as unknown - Jefe's Penut vote, Red_Baron's "we've", and Damuna's... moment...
Although, with that post, I'm now wondering why you're bothered about someone getting a read on you...
Haha - if I could have a quote for a signature I would be considering that one - Damn nice post :D
Can't really say much about the we've, its semantics yet impossible for me to explain other than I tend to use that even when referring to myself when talking about an object/event of unified interest. But thats real life, dunno if I do it when I write. Hmm oh well, maybe I'll notice it if I do it again. And yes, the moment :D
One thing though, whats the penut vote your talking about?
Pre-post edit: Why doesn't GOG auto update :( Anyway a new development! Pazzer appears to have sprung into some trap nmillar was playing? I can follow the first "strike", slightly the second "strike" (Though I wouldn't call talking about a mods habits for modding the mod?) and strike 3 I am not even sure I understand. I see the jump on wagon idea, but whats the part about two people casting votes and the obvious target? Am I correct when I interpret it as saying that he votes for you because if you turned town then Vitek/Rob would be targets due to taking part in the initial argument/voting?
Side note: Damn a lot of stuff happens while busy at study/training - Good thing its worth the reading.