Alright, I might be getting a bit lost here, but I looked at it like this:
1. Nmillar raises suspicion on Rod & Vitek for voting NFY in rapid succession
2. I ask why those actions would be suspicious considering they were the first two votes for NFY, and that would still leave NFY with 7 to lynch. In other words, it seems like a pretty weak attempt to get a train forming on NFY
3. Nmillar responds that his case is weak or almost non-existent, but that my post could be perceived as scummy for asking such questions.
The real thing we have to wonder here is how a post could be perceived as scummy for asking reasonable questions when the person in question admitted that his case was "weak" or non-existent.
The case by his own words wasn't strong, and he also said that my question made sense. So why would that be "perceived as scummy"?
It does indeed sound like a veiled threat, as some here have implied.
But no one else has ran to Nmillar's defense here, which is giving me a little pause about assuming he is mafia. You figure at least one of the others would have jumped to his defense.
Big problem here is that only about half of the posters have been truly active on the thread, so that complicates things.
I'll assume it was a memory error, but I voted for Sir Primalform, not NFY.
This was a humourous (in my mind anyway) response to his query about killing the thread (posts 55 & 56).