Fair enough I guess. But I'd remind you of what Twilight pointed out a while ago, that in game 10 they almost lynched a mafia D1 but let him off because he was new...
True. But it's a risk I'm willing to take.
Some points in my defence:
1. You're measuring my behaviour against a sample of two (well, 1.75) games,which are the only 1.75 games I've ever played...! Admittedly they were long games, but still. Additionally I'm puzzled as to why active agressiveness means I must be scum. You really think if I was first-time mafia I'd be drawing attention to myself and going all out like this?
But in those two samples, you were consistent. And kind of distinctive, really. Not here. And do not bring out the Damnation Defence, please. That will hardly sway anyone.
2. I admit the Damuna thing reads like I was setting him up. I apologise for that. (I genuinely wasn't trying to (standard NFY-logic is insane)). I included this in the summary for clarity's sake, but it shouldn't be considered part of my current arguments.
I'll reread the thing and get back to you on this.
3. At the time I stated I was making an assumption for the sake of having something
to work with rather than all the possibilities floating around. I took time responding right away because I wanted to double check my own logic (see 2...)
Yeah, ultimately this point is my statement against yours. I know I'm backing my point of view, but I wouldn't be surprised if not everyone did.