It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
Rodzaju: It was me who suggested 4 scum (in post 193).
Pure assumption based on the standard 25%.
avatar
nmillar: Hang on, isn't it you that normally accuses me of being "in the know" when making that assumption? o_O

Is it time to throw in the multiple mafia theory too?
Personally, I have seen noting at all to suggest multiple mafia factions.
Until I do, I'm not even going to consider it.
avatar
nmillar: Hang on, isn't it you that normally accuses me of being "in the know" when making that assumption? o_O

Is it time to throw in the multiple mafia theory too?
avatar
Rodzaju: Personally, I have seen noting at all to suggest multiple mafia factions.
Until I do, I'm not even going to consider it.
You didn't answer my question!

Isn't it you that normally accuses me of being "in the know" when making that assumption? o_O

The multiple mafia thing was a joke.
avatar
Rodzaju: Personally, I have seen noting at all to suggest multiple mafia factions.
Until I do, I'm not even going to consider it.
avatar
nmillar: You didn't answer my question!

Isn't it you that normally accuses me of being "in the know" when making that assumption? o_O

The multiple mafia thing was a joke.
I believe I did so in 1 game (9).
I would not call that "normally".

Also, in that game, you clearly WERE in the know!
avatar
Rodzaju: I believe I did so in 1 game (9).
I would not call that "normally".

Also, in that game, you clearly WERE in the know!
In Game 9, I brought up the multiple mafia theory, but I'm talking about making assumptions about the number of mafia members in a game, which I think I've done in most games. Somebody certainly called me out on it more than once, but perhaps it wasn't you.
avatar
Red_Baron: I don't really record the strategy to have worked of yet (I might easily just have forgotten if it has) and I can so far only recall on sure hit by nmillar, where he was himself the scum.
Only caught this on a re-read. My strategy was successful in Game 1, Game 4 and Game 6, the latter two both being town wins.
avatar
nmillar: Only caught this on a re-read. My strategy was successful in Game 1, Game 4 and Game 6, the latter two both being town wins.
Okay thanks, I'll have to look that up :)
avatar
nmillar: Only caught this on a re-read. My strategy was successful in Game 1, Game 4 and Game 6, the latter two both being town wins.
avatar
Red_Baron: Okay thanks, I'll have to look that up :)
Actually, a correction:

Game 1: Titanium
Game 4: ViolatorX
Game 5: ViolatorX, Rodzaju (this is the reason he votes for me in every game!)
avatar
nmillar: Actually, a correction:

Game 1: Titanium
Game 4: ViolatorX
Game 5: ViolatorX, Rodzaju (this is the reason he votes for me in every game!)
Game 1: You went after Titanium with completely incorrect assumption that he has to be scum because you tried to shot him and was blocked. Luckily, he really was scum.
Game 5: You knew Violator is scum because he lied about your role, so it's different too. ;-)
avatar
Red_Baron: Okay thanks, I'll have to look that up :)
avatar
nmillar: Actually, a correction:

Game 1: Titanium
Game 4: ViolatorX
Game 5: ViolatorX, Rodzaju (this is the reason he votes for me in every game!)
I'm fairly certain ViolatorX's lynch was more of a result of him trying to help Typhoon's argument and being dragged into oblivion. (I'm also fairly certain that in any case NMillar was busy with Game #4 or something on the day of his lynch and I had to do a considerable amount of the shouting, but still.)

Regarding the NMillar/Vitek argument, I haven't been entirely convinced if Vitek is Mafia by any of the evidence provided, but this does seem to be NMillar's normal play style to me, so NMillar's leaning Town at the moment - that does not, however, directly influence my read on Vitek's alignment, as NMillar's accuracy has never quite been matched by his enthusiasm once he gets going. :P

Pazzer... Pazzer I'm uncertain about, as some of his reasoning seems a bit off to me, but that in itself is not scummy - if we all thought in the same way, this would be a dull game. :P While I seem to recall the wiki saying something along the lines of the third person to vote on a stack often being scum, a) I can't remember if there was a "For an x-player game..." clause in there, and b) despite my read, it has yet to be proven that side NMillar (as the person ...being stacked upon? What's the terminology here?) is on, which I'm fairly certain was required for this particular tell to make sense.

StoicSentry has seemed somewhat scummy due to a bit of a habit of following other player's reasoning for quite a few of his votes, but I'm not sure yet - as he's new, he might just be thinking that the other players will know better. I will, of course, concede that in his vote against Damuna's case his reasoning that we have no idea of his alignment from it does mean we might need to vote him anyway, but quite frankly I feel the entire plan's so far into WIFOM territory that it's staggering to think about.

Rodzaju... (sigh) I'll be honest with you, I'm never entirely sure what Rod's thinking, and I'm sure the closest thing I've had to a Town read on him was when he was, in fact, the Mafia (Game #5 again), so all in all I'm probably not the best judge of character in his case.

That's enough for one post, though there are certainly more people I should comment on later.
avatar
QuadrAlien: Rodzaju... (sigh) I'll be honest with you, I'm never entirely sure what Rod's thinking, and I'm sure the closest thing I've had to a Town read on him was when he was, in fact, the Mafia (Game #5 again), so all in all I'm probably not the best judge of character in his case.
Yeah, I kinda felt bad for killing you when you were trying to protect me.
For those not in the know, Quad was the town doc & he protected me the night I killed him.

Of the 4 complete games I have played in (4,5,8 & 9) I was scum in 3 of them, so I'm still very much learning how a town player is supposed to play!
Heck, just read through the game 9 fiasco....
avatar
Rodzaju: Heck, just read through the game 9 fiasco....
Comeon, you did well - for the mafia by confusing all the town players :P
avatar
Rodzaju: Heck, just read through the game 9 fiasco....
avatar
Red_Baron: Comeon, you did well - for the mafia by confusing all the town players :P
But I was town......
avatar
nmillar: Finally!

avatar
pazzer: Not got the time to do a full catch so just read last few posts. Will get to stuff I've missed later. Going to go ahead and Unvote as have some suspects now.
avatar
nmillar: Mentions he has suspects, but doesn't name any of them.

Strike 1.

avatar
pazzer: Damnation is an evil mod though just look at all the stuff he pulled in game 4. So I see including a jester and not telling us as something he might do.
avatar
nmillar: Modding the mod.

Strike 2.

avatar
pazzer: Nmillar is pushing Vitek hard and looks to me like he's trying to make a case out of nothing. As it seems however Vitek has defend himself Nmillar has said it makes him look more mafia like.

Vote Nmillar
avatar
nmillar: Jumping on a bandwagon that looks to be picking up steam safe in the knowledge that plenty of accusations have been thrown around about the first two people casting votes, who would then become the obvious suspects when the target flips town.

Strike 3; you're outta here!

Unvote Vitek. Vote pazzer.
erm... am I the only one who thinks this is weak as hell?
avatar
Damnation: You two have 24 hours to reply to this thread before I attempt to find replacements.
(Yes, I am being lenient on xzyem due to him being new)
Responding to prod.
avatar
Damnation: You two have 24 hours to reply to this thread before I attempt to find replacements.
(Yes, I am being lenient on xzyem due to him being new)
avatar
Damuna: Responding to prod.
And what?
No input at all?