What? What does no arguments against any other players have to do with this? Have you presented any arguments agaisnt any other player?

I answered all your points, you call it dismissing them, but if they are moot and I answer them, so yes, it's logical they will be dismissed. Also it was you who called your arguments "pretty non-existent" and now you accuse me of dismissing them?

Individually they are indeed pretty non-existent, but when they're combined together they do make up the beginnings of a case.

Your posts have been the most scummy (in my opinion) so far, so until someone out scummifies you, then my vote is staying exactly where it is.

Is it normal for the first day to take 2 weeks? LOL

It's pretty common. Lots of days go right up to the deadlines.

Oh I didn't realize there was a deadline.

There is, though usually there is enough time to reach some sort of consensus before it hits. In rare cases like Christmas or similar situation where not many people check in regularly the deadline can pose a problem, even causing mis-lynch due to haste (rather a chance to hit scum instead of a certain no hit - An idea that usually fails). The mod can however extend the deadline.

Ok, I've been let off with a warning.

So I'm still here whether you like it or not! Mwahahahahahahahaha!

Some quick modding needed - The whole jefe situation, he's been let off with a warning. It's good there are people who can notice whether a double post is an honest mistake though, so thank you for being my eyes there, nmillar. Overall, I agree with Robbeasy - the rule is there to prevent much later post changes, but in the end, if no one sees the original post, it becomes difficult for me to judge. Anyhow, let everyone know that they should be careful about this, and if they run into the issue of having posted and wanting to post again, just keep calm and wait those annoying ten minutes :p

On deadlines, there is one, but considering it's day 1 and there's 16 players, it's quite a while off (I go by a 7 days + number of players for deadlines, since we began 6 days ago, that still gives you 17 days. The exact date and time will be included in a vote count when we hit 14 days left)

Having a few probs with internet dropping off. So if I suddenly stop posting that's why.

Baron, where did you point this out before I did? I read through quickly and I couldn't find it...

This post
http://www.gog.com/en/forum/general/gog_forum_mafia_11_the_goghammer_festival/post142

Hope the url linking succeed - Should be the last of that post (Its a short comment, so understandable that it was missed).

Already looking for way out and for another target? ;-)

Usually I would think it is just misguided town attack but you made some strange posts and accusation that I don't think so now.
I don't like how you: 1. ignored most of my responses and questions
2. claim it's non-existent claim and wonder how I dismiss
(after answering it moreso)
3. when stoicsentry asked you perfectly valid questions, you
complimented him, said it's indeed good and then ignored it and called
him my scumbuddy.

But it looks it is just our bickering because apparently amlost no one else cares about it.

Really, people like detlik, xzyem, Damuna, QuadrAlien (I even forgot he's playing) need to post more. I would expect more posts from Rodzaju too but givern his state I think it's understandable why he doesn't post as much as he usually does.

What questions?

No, I said it was a pretty weak case, but that doesn't mean there isn't one there at all.

Again, not true. I stated that Stoicsentry's post could have been perceived as scummy (i.e. sticking up for you), but complimented him on the fact that he was presenting his own theories.

I did post yesterday, somewhere between posts 271 & 272, but the forum seems to have eaten it.

I was saying that, reading through your exchange, it seems to me that Nmillar is the scummier of the 2.

His normal pattern is to sit back, making a few observations or asking a few questions, until he feels that he has a strong case. Then he goes for the throat.
Not so this time.
For comparison, check game 5, or any of the other games he has played here.
Then check game 9, where he was scum.
Nmillars style here seems much closer to that of his play in game 9.

I am loathe to come to Vitek's defense, given the alleged voting links between us.
Then again, it was Nmillar that drew those links.
Both of my votes that have been highlighted were pure RVS votes.
The first (for Nmillar) has already been explained.
The second (for SPF) shouldn't need an explanation.

Unvote SPF; Vote Nmillar

I believe you fail quoted there nmillar ;) Also I don't really see the supposed scummy acting of Viteks (considering how scummy I found him when he was a traitor he'll have to work to get it :P).