Posted February 18, 2013
I started thinking about genres lately. I believe genre should be assessed by the experience the game provides or the reaction it intends to produce on the player. Unfortunately, a lot of games get classified as one genre or another because of their camera, art style and such superficial elements.
Is there a game you played that is commonly considered to belong to one genre, that you believe belongs to another?
I'll go first: the Yakuza series on the PS2 and PS3. It's a JRPG. From the long-winded cutscenes all the way to the random encounters, but because it has realistic looking characters in a realistic environment everyone dismisses it as Beat'em Up. It's specially annoying with that game because the people that say it's not a JRPG since it's too different, are usually the same ones that complain that JRPGs are all the same.
Is there a game you played that is commonly considered to belong to one genre, that you believe belongs to another?
I'll go first: the Yakuza series on the PS2 and PS3. It's a JRPG. From the long-winded cutscenes all the way to the random encounters, but because it has realistic looking characters in a realistic environment everyone dismisses it as Beat'em Up. It's specially annoying with that game because the people that say it's not a JRPG since it's too different, are usually the same ones that complain that JRPGs are all the same.