And the cracks continue to show... Baron responded the way he did because he was cornered, simple as that. He has yet to display any plausible reason for stating he wanted more info, and then immediately voting on the easy train. Thats because he has none and his best mode of escape was to try and implicate me once the light was shined on him. His deep suspicion of me started right after I pressed him for info in with a single post, really? If that doesnt define hitting the mark, I dont know what does.
What again?? You simply can't help it can you. And let me follow you on this one, and without taking each paragraph although it makes for an easier overview:
Lets take the points again: ITS NOT A FREAKING TRAIN! How can it ever be a train if two people, now one person, is voting for it. And at the same time how the heck can you so calmly state that one of your prime reasons is that I picked the easy train, when its:
- Not a train
- Not easy (several stated they figured him town, and 2 of the people besides me an Itai whom voted for stuart is dead).
- And I weren't the first to vote for it, nor the one to keep my vote on him, unlike Itai, which you still aren't mentioning at all...
Lets move on: Its not a crack, most of my case against you remains exactly the same, the only thing it does is changing how much I thought I've gotten as hints from you in regards of the knowledge thing I mentioned several times already. A plausible reason for why I wanted more info?
? Are you seriously going there in a mafia game? By God! Why would I not want more info in a mafia game? Its the whole point of the game, and stating that I hope we gain something of info from the desperate lynch and a potential harmful night kill (as it showed to be), is pretty damn reasonable.
And a single post? You good sir had 3 posts before I responded and yes my deep suspicious of you started due to those 3 posts as those were the posts where I saw you throw reason aside in a crazy stunt to get a lynch going, while clearly not voting yourself, an action I also find incredibly scummy (and yes, know you have voted now, after being called on it.)
Oh and you have yet to explain any of things I've pointed out, still just coming forth with the same accusations, of which none still make any sense to me. And if your going to talk about cracks, please do make the right reasonings that makes those cracks yourself. All your doing now is restating your own lousy case against me, in the hope that someone will eventually join in.
I am grateful for joe pointing out the flaw, since it meant that my view of things was a little different, and knowing now that it was stuart who wrote it and that he apparently mis-read us to be me and Zchinque.. dunno why, but yea - basically means that I get the point with the sentence and find it less suspect. However that was stuarts post as it has so correctly been pointed out, not yours. Nothing is changed in my view of you being scum, only slightly as to why you wrote as you did.
In regards of stuarts post. Yea, I actually meant that post as a help (explaining the "we" word, since it had already been discussed and the thing with penut), but I guess due to being engrossed in my discussion with muttly13 I ended up making it a discussion as well.. Properly why I mis-read the buddying up part. Though if you read what I wrote I do also point out that muttly13 is not really buddying up to you, he is calling you an easy lynch train and thats the only thing he really have said in your defense. And yea, figured thats what you meant with historic, just wanted to clarify it weren't some meta reason.
Final: I like your notice - Hehe, yea I show my discussion nature a lot in these games. Bad thing is I also tend to make huge posts because of it. But heck, maybe that will make it easier for people to get a proper read of me.. or maybe not.