You appear to have missed a few things, allow me to explain and comment as well.
on it for historic reasons.
Just curious, but what historic reason?
I'm finding that "we" a little wierd though.
Vitek and myself has already explained to someone else who asked that question, that the we Vitek wrote, was referring to him and joe.... take a look at a few posts back and you'll see both mine and Viteks post explaining it.
What do I think about muttly. I am surprised at him being so defensive of me, but I think it is because he is using it to push his own agenda. and to be honest I'm a little annoyed that he is putting thoughts and ideas I am having out before I do, it's leaving me with little to say.
He is pushing your ideas and thoughts out, and they are those ideas you would have posted yourself..huh? How can he ever knows what your thinking. When I started reading that sentence I thought it would end with you saying the annoyance steamed from him putting the thoughts/ideas out. (-Not sure where he does that, but well whatever). Point being I don't really follow you on this sentence.
I'm finding the thing between Baron and Muttly a little strange.
I think Barons actions are suspect, I can't find the post but I seem to remember he suggested that my thing with crazybear implied I was a bit scummy, and it was all just a diversionary tactic (an idea that seems to have never left him) and I'm finding it to be very like the thing he is having with muttly.
Well, if I have any recollection of a post like that it must be from RVS and in any case it has absolutely nothing to do with the case I have against muttly13 nor why I was inquiring about you. For one thing: Crazy is known to be town, so the whole idea if it was ever used would fall flat on its ass. No, my case against muttly13 is due to his extreme way of trying to find a way to place me as the perfect lynch target, while hinting at something thats either a very stupid way of considering a mafia game or shows clear insider knowledge.
I'm undecided about muttly, I agree with much of what he is saying (maybe because it falls pro-me), except it is so defensive that it could be construed as buddying up, which is the kind of attention I don't need, but then Rob's comments on how it may be a scum ploy sounds plausible too, so I'm a bit stuck on this one.
Huh? How can muttly13's case against me be buddying up? Pretty sure he is not trying to be friendly with me and he aren't really defending you except for the first post. He is mostly just using the fact that I voted for you again as the igniter for his odd argument. So given the choice you saying about either buddying up or Robs scum plot, your basically saying you don't know which to pick, but your leaning to it being a mafia ploy. And don't worry, if anything I am rather certain that muttly13 has cleaned up off my list, since I can't imagine a mafia using his own buddy like that. And the only reason your still at the bottom of my list (most people in the game remains on my list until confirmed), is your odd posts (like this one).
Though I do hate to bring up the whole lurker thing again, Peanut seems to be lurking heavily, is this scum trying to slip under the radar is a question that is kind of nagging at me.
Its only 19 hours since he wrote last and mentioned troubles in the family.. we have others more silent/equally silent with not much of a reason.
These are my only scumdar pings at the moment. I kind of switched off completely at the end of day 1 (I didn't think this game would be so
exhausting) and I feel haven't got going again yet so I'm a bit short of ideas right now.
Hehe, well I tend to find energy from these discussions, and the latest one with muttly13 is just so amusing that I am really feeling pumped for the argumentation, but yea that might of course depend entirely on the person and the point of view. Hope you'll enjoy it even more later and be less exhausted.