No.

It's not just IE, it's the majority of browsers.
GOG deciding what browser you must use, and not giving you a choice, is not a good thing.

Freebies are honey in such cases, but something physical(digital data in this case) given freely is often less remembered than a kind word/gesture.

As such, I believe(and often see) that mass giveaways by sites/stores are less memorable good PR than a site sticking to it;s core principles or valuing the community(or seeming to) over the dollar/mark/pound/etc.
Does that include Edge? I ask as many PCs come with that as the sole/default browser and if many sites dropped support for it that'd piss a bunch of people off or make it harder for them to get other browsers without going to another PC.

If the devs make money for little effor to keep it on GOG then why have GOG remove it and lose out on extra money?

It all depends on how much that extra effort cost them and how much they have to gain from it. For some, a couple of thousands sold copies might be more than enough, for some, it might be so little, it is basically meaningless. It all depends on the developer and their cost structure.

True, but if they just have to let GOG keep the game on the server how does it cost the dev much if at all?

GoGs biggest problem is leadership or lack thereof. The company has no focus or understanding of what they are or what they want to be,

When CDP started GoG it was Good Old Games, they created a store that was a one-stop shop for players who wanted or never had a chance to play some of the great PC games of all time and to get games free of DRM so they could play anytime anywhere.

GoG then built their excellent GoGDownloader.

Eventually, the number of outstanding good old games that GoG could acquire the rights to and the number that were still out dwindled and GoG opened the platform to new games also. This was a great decision, IMO.

But today, GoG has no idea what it wants to be or what direction it wants to go. It is clear that the company has no plans or directions for growth. This is clear and evident as they decline numerous games (evidence by the number of new games that appear and the numbers declined) suggest they decline more than they accept. Thus growth is impossible when Steam and Epic Store have much larger libraries.

GoGs curation has no logic, reason or guidelines for developers or fans/Sellers and buyers to follow and understand what products will and will not be available. Based on what has been accepted and declined quality is not a parameter in the decision making process. Despite what GoG claims, sales also are not a parameter. The niche argument is beyond stupid with GoG turning down successful games, but hawking Kickstarter projects by unproven developers.

Now GoG no longer supports or lets you use the GoGdownloader, puts the Galaxy installer as the default installing option and does not communicate with its user base at all.

This complete lack of understanding the market and your own user base is because the GoG has no leadership and those in the position are simply incompetent and incapable of being in charge and making the correct decisions.

I forgot that...thanks for the infos.

Just because they strive to create the ultimate gaming program, doesn't mean they are shifting away from their customer base. Connecting other games with their program doesn't earn them money. Let us see what will happen when they release Galaxy 2.0.

I'm surprised those fans weren't at a klan rally.

And the answer to the question is YES.