F4LL0UT: Infidels - like my lovable yet evil girlfriend - would say that you make people pay for something that they already bought a decade ago but I refuse to see it that way. I choose the romantic thought that I described above. You are my heroes.

Titanium: Maybe in retrospect... you know, in the future, when we'll all be anally probed before starting a game to prevent us from pirating it (it will make sense in context), we'll look fondly on the classics like Duke Nukem Forever and Postal 3 where anal probing was still figurative.

Navagon: I've come across people on these forums that insist that new games will be better five years from now. Yeah...

Wishbone: http://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2008/5/9/

timppu: Maybe they were referring to the games being fully patched then, also with various user mods that enhance it further, etc.?

Anyway, as said, I don't think many people object "new" games. They object games they've bought already from e.g. Steam and so on, as in "This release does not interest me because I have the game already elsewhere! Not fair! GOG should not release games I have already!".

Since I have not bought AC and HOMM5 from Steam (nor the US-only Amazon), from my point of view they are more than welcome to arrive here too. In fact, even if I had bought them already elsewhere, I'd still welcome them here. Go figure.

keeveek: I felt really bad when Guillermo said "we will bring you at least one classic game a week" or something like that. One is less than two, guys...

Also, I don't know why GOG.com is expanding it's catalogue so slowly. Two games a week while the competition grows like 30 games a month? I understand it;s not easy to bring oldies back, because you need to optimize them, but for new releases? They should be released more often, imho..

brendano: It reminds me of when Nintendo's Virtual Console started seeing releases less frequently. I hope that won't be the same case here.

Tormentfan: It was an attack.. call it advice.

keeveek: Great letter. We share the exact thoughts. The only way to not harm old releases is staying the way it was. New old releases tue and thu.
You want to bring us new games? Fine, but please make it in different weekdays.

If there isn't two new old releases a week, I think I will stop visiting the store. I don't want to be disappointed with some Assassin's Creeds or another indie game that everybody already have.

WE WANT OLD GAMES to stay on gog. (mostly, and most of us ;p) I don't think when you saw your poll results anybody wanted new releases to be made INSTEAD OF old ones. We wanted newer games to be released as an addition. Not replacement.

I felt really bad when Guillermo said "we will bring you at least one classic game a week" or something like that. One is less than two, guys...

Also, I don't know why GOG.com is expanding it's catalogue so slowly. Two games a week while the competition grows like 30 games a month? I understand it;s not easy to bring oldies back, because you need to optimize them, but for new releases? They should be released more often, imho..

tejozaszaszas: I think that the old release schedule they use to have was 6 each month. Count them if you like.

keeveek: As an oldie I see a game that is considered classic. It might be from 2007 or 2008, at least it's considered to be a milestone or something like that.

I also opt strongly for 4 releases a week (2 new, 2 old), but it seems they're sticking with old Tue Thu release schedule, and that bothers me.

Expanding the catalogue but not expanding the releases numbers...