Posted February 08, 2013
low rated
Guns dont belong in Rpgs-guns are for cowards.
This question / problem has been solved by Jlerpy
Posted February 09, 2013
There's no reason to limit RPG's to situations with no guns. Why would limiting your role-play options make a better game? You could do it in a play-through as an extra challenge; I've done those kinds of limitations before, and they are a fun way of making a familiar game challenging again. But I like when the developers give options. Makes the experience richer, IMO.
Posted February 10, 2013
Im of the opinion that guns can be interesting in rpgs if done right. I happen to favor party based games with guns moreso than solo character ones. I dont really know why, but it can sometimes be fun. I still love my fantasy based rpgs more because Im medieval regarding that. The cool thing about guns in party based games is that you can really mix things up and make tactics fun (especially with turnbased games).
Whereas in usual party games, you still have roles in the game. Tank is still a tank, except instead of a heavy sword and strong armor, he's got high health and a shotgun. DPS is usually a rifleusing marksman or even a pistol user if you dual wield. Then there are smgs and uzis. Basically, it can be alot of fun playing games like that and yes rpgs can broaden to using guns.
Fallout is probably a good/best example where guns are present. I happen to think that if tactics was done with a sequel/more games it would be excellent. I really liked what they were doing with party combat in that game. Screw real time, I still played in turnbased.
Whereas in usual party games, you still have roles in the game. Tank is still a tank, except instead of a heavy sword and strong armor, he's got high health and a shotgun. DPS is usually a rifleusing marksman or even a pistol user if you dual wield. Then there are smgs and uzis. Basically, it can be alot of fun playing games like that and yes rpgs can broaden to using guns.
Fallout is probably a good/best example where guns are present. I happen to think that if tactics was done with a sequel/more games it would be excellent. I really liked what they were doing with party combat in that game. Screw real time, I still played in turnbased.
Posted February 10, 2013
Whereas in usual party games, you still have roles in the game. Tank is still a tank, except instead of a heavy sword and strong armor, he's got high health and a shotgun. DPS is usually a rifleusing marksman or even a pistol user if you dual wield. Then there are smgs and uzis. Basically, it can be alot of fun playing games like that and yes rpgs can broaden to using guns.
Fallout is probably a good/best example where guns are present. I happen to think that if tactics was done with a sequel/more games it would be excellent. I really liked what they were doing with party combat in that game. Screw real time, I still played in turnbased.
Posted February 11, 2013
Guns are for people who want to survive! I think guys with melee weapons are great. They're excellent target practice! I don't mind if you feel the need to brag about not being a coward. Die happy knowing that the money I loot off your corpse will be spent on ammunition and booze. :D
Also, I'm just messing around a little. :P
Also, I'm just messing around a little. :P
Posted February 20, 2013
Whereas in usual party games, you still have roles in the game. Tank is still a tank, except instead of a heavy sword and strong armor, he's got high health and a shotgun. DPS is usually a rifleusing marksman or even a pistol user if you dual wield. Then there are smgs and uzis. Basically, it can be alot of fun playing games like that and yes rpgs can broaden to using guns.
Fallout is probably a good/best example where guns are present. I happen to think that if tactics was done with a sequel/more games it would be excellent. I really liked what they were doing with party combat in that game. Screw real time, I still played in turnbased.
