136
avatar
QC: Well, nobody says that they admire every aspect of anything. Perfection is an impossible goal for everything, everyone. The link I put into my second post for example, I don't care for the christian faith, I simply don't. But, the christian world has done good in that it holds people to a moral standard in a way that isn't forceful. I've held myself to standards as strict has any church and defy the religion completely. A person who holds themselves to the same standard BECAUSE of religion is the type who doesn't have reason or motivation in their life without it. And yes, reincarnation when you tie it to a reason of Karma may or not be folly. But it isn't fair to who the person is right now.
Just a note, the entire abortion debate, the debate about gay marriage, and a host of other things are all about some Christians (in this country's case) forcing their beliefs on everyone else with the force of law. Of course, any law is going to force something on someone who doesn't agree with it. But it's completely inaccurate to say Christians don't force their shit on anyone else, they're at least as guilty as anyone else (and many would argue more) guilty.
137
I like to think of myself as an antichrist. failing that I'll go agnostic.
138
avatar
QC: Well, nobody says that they admire every aspect of anything. Perfection is an impossible goal for everything, everyone. The link I put into my second post for example, I don't care for the christian faith, I simply don't. But, the christian world has done good in that it holds people to a moral standard in a way that isn't forceful. I've held myself to standards as strict has any church and defy the religion completely. A person who holds themselves to the same standard BECAUSE of religion is the type who doesn't have reason or motivation in their life without it. And yes, reincarnation when you tie it to a reason of Karma may or not be folly. But it isn't fair to who the person is right now.
avatar
orcishgamer: Just a note, the entire abortion debate, the debate about gay marriage, and a host of other things are all about some Christians (in this country's case) forcing their beliefs on everyone else with the force of law. Of course, any law is going to force something on someone who doesn't agree with it. But it's completely inaccurate to say Christians don't force their shit on anyone else, they're at least as guilty as anyone else (and many would argue more) guilty.
I didn't really mean that they didn't push their ideology on others, just that those who are faithful to it are devoted to a set of morals including not killing, not stealing, not causing deception. The practice that most religions have to pass their message and method on to others at all times though is indeed something that pisses me off.
139
avatar
QC: not killing, not stealing, not causing deception.
Well, it sounds like you and I largely agree, then, my apologies for misunderstanding. Though I still maintain that religion merely reflects those things above in the quote, not doing those things is mostly innate in all of us. Religion reflects people, it's not reflected in people.
140
I'm a Scientologist.

Heil Xenu!
141
avatar
GoJays2025: My opinion is that the consciousness is simply the result of neuron connections in the brain. Everything we experience and all of our memories are due to electric impulses from our nervous systems and the physical connections of the neurons themselves, kind of like a computer actually. Therefore when we die the system shuts down and we will no longer be conscious and will cease to exist.

It's actually really moving for me when I think that this life is all that you'll ever experience. Everyone alive came in against such great odds to be given a chance on this beautiful planet. Our lives are but a blink of the eye in the grand scheme of things, but to have existed, to have been a part of the universe, and to have had laughs and fun in our short time here, I find myself to be extremely fortunate. What is there to life? What's the purpose of life? Is there a Heaven? Who cares? Nobody can objectively answer these questions. The only thing you can do is enjoy the time we're given. I think by 'knowing' that my existence is so short and that my end is coming closer with each given day gives my life more meaning than any god could ever provide me.
Well put. My outlook on life is extremely similar to yours, as is my opinion on the source of sentience...our consciousness is a result of the fact that we are biological computers that are turned on. Our consciousness ends when we are turned off.
avatar
timppu: So if that complex "computer" of countless neuron connections was perfectly replicated by nature billion years from now by a sheer stroke of luck, would "you" experience a new consciousness, or would it still be someone else?
It would absolutely be a brand new "someone else" with no connection at all to the past. What could possibly connect it to the past? The memories would have to be transferred somehow from the old person to the new person. To say it another way, under your hypothetical, both people have the same hardware, but all of the files and memory and bits of data and software that were collected by the old person over the course of a lifetime wouldn't magically transfer to the new person. The new person would start fresh.
Post edited February 07, 2012 by da187jimmbones
142
avatar
GoJays2025: It's not unreasonable to want to reach out to somebody in times of need. I get why people take comfort in God, it's just that I really do wish people wouldn't force religion (or atheism for that matter) upon others and to keep an open mind to what others may believe.
I don't mind what people believe and I'm totally cool with people being part of a religion. I just find it odd. I don't treat religion with much reverence either, which lead to someone threatening to beat me up once.
143
i am a non-believer
however i will not hate on someone who does
the only thing i can't understand is creationism
144
avatar
timppu: So if that complex "computer" of countless neuron connections was perfectly replicated by nature billion years from now by a sheer stroke of luck, would "you" experience a new consciousness, or would it still be someone else?
avatar
da187jimmbones: It would absolutely be a brand new "someone else" with no connection at all to the past. What could possibly connect it to the past? The memories would have to be transferred somehow from the old person to the new person. To say it another way, under your hypothetical, both people have the same hardware, but all of the files and memory and bits of data and software that were collected by the old person over the course of a lifetime wouldn't magically transfer to the new person. The new person would start fresh.
But memories are also just neural connections in the brain, which can be replicated and I think that by "perfectly replicated" timppu may have meant the memories will also be the same.
145
I'm Agnostic, tipping more towards Athiest. Saying that, I hate the Athiests who will continually slam religion (such as Richard Dawkins) as much as I hate the extremist Religious people.
146
avatar
Shadyhacker: But memories are also just neural connections in the brain, which can be replicated and I think that by "perfectly replicated" timppu may have meant the memories will also be the same.
I don't know anymore what I meant. :) Brains keep evolving after our birth, so could it be said we have a completely different consciousness when we are e.g. 5 years old or 50 years old? Also taking into account cases of amnesia due to accident or whatever... So in a way, if it is possible to replace consciousness due to e.g. accident (ie. start from a clean table), would it be also theoretically possible to replicate, or recreate, someone's consciousness?

Anyway, that's just a small part of what I ponder about "reincarnation", and I'm sure I'm a few thousand years late pondering about these. The damn Greek philosophers ninja'ed. I'm sure all this is explained (and debunked) in some beginner's philosophy university course.
Post edited February 08, 2012 by timppu
147
avatar
GoJays2025: My opinion is that the consciousness is simply the result of neuron connections in the brain.
avatar
timppu: So if that complex "computer" of countless neuron connections was perfectly replicated by nature billion years from now by a sheer stroke of luck, would "you" experience a new consciousness, or would it still be someone else?

I guess philosophers and charismatic people who invent new religions have pondered over these for thousands of years, if not more.
Different Input into the same Hardware/Software configuration will make 2 divergent people.

That is why a clone would be a completely different person even if raise in same way as your environment has a large effect on how you develop.
Post edited February 08, 2012 by Vaemer-Riit
148
Atheism is a trendy way to let people think they are better than others. There is a two ended spectrum, with theism and atheism on each side. Typically, the closer you are to either end,the more.of a douche you are, and the more likely to commit/condone hotrible atrocities.

We are ALL agnostic ultimately, we just don't all accept it.
149
topic: *you are

Apatheist. (Religious discussions in any way are a total waste of human energy.) In fact, I shouldn't even be posting here.
150
avatar
anjohl: Atheism is a trendy way to let people think they are better than others. There is a two ended spectrum, with theism and atheism on each side. Typically, the closer you are to either end,the more.of a douche you are, and the more likely to commit/condone hotrible atrocities.

We are ALL agnostic ultimately, we just don't all accept it.
And apparently you think that, as an acknowledged agnostic, you are better than everyone else.

Hmmmmm.....
Post edited February 08, 2012 by kalirion